The BFG (2016)
Director: Steven Spielberg
Cast: Mark Rylance, Ruby Barnhill, Penelope Wilton, Rebecca
Hall, Bill Hader
The BFG is Steven Spielberg’s first official box office flop,
which is a rare thing because ever since he kicked off Summer Blockbusters back
in 1975 with the creation of Jaws (1975), he’s been on the good side of box
office success for most of his career. Even his bad ones make money, just look
at the disastrous Indiana Jones sequel, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the
Crystal Skull (2008) or Spielberg’s failed attempt at a war comedy, 1941 (1979)
both made their money back even though they stunk. So The BFG (2016) is a
landmark movie for Spielberg, but only because its his biggest failure. Yet,
did it deserve to fail? Is it a stinker? We’ve seen Spielberg half-ass a movie
haven’t we? Just the other day I was watching The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
and realized how truly lame it actually is. Sure it’s got gee whiz special
effects, double the dinosaurs (oh wow, two T-REX’s!) and lot’s of action, but
at its core, the tepid script doesn’t even compare to Jurassic Park (1993) in
terms of overall quality, there was no meat with those potatoes, dare I say no
heart! But we forgive Spielberg because then he turns around and makes another
great film and well, we forget all about his last bad one. But is The BFG one
of his bad ones? Was Spielberg half-assing it with The BFG? Why did it tank so
spectacularly at the box office?
The BFG is based on Roald Dahl’s book of the same name. Dahl
was also the author behind such children’s classics as Charlie and the
Chocolate Factory, James and the Giant Peach, Fantastic Mr. Fox, The Witches
and Matilda, all of which have also been adapted to films. So just to make
thinks clear here, this film is based on the book of a beloved author, directed
by one of the greatest directors of all time and produced by Disney the most
successful movie studio at the moment. So why did it flop? I was curious about
this myself, the trailers made the film look magical, and truth be told it is. It’s
a fairy tale that involves giants, the origin of dreams and true friendship. It
felt like a mix between Peter Pan and Jack and the Beanstalk. So, with all these
good things going for it, why the failure? I guess the only true reason I can
think of is that it’s not all that exciting. Sure not every movie has to be
action packed. In my book, there’s also space for films that are quieter in
nature, films that slow things down, that feel like someone is whispering a
story under the covers of your bed in the middle of the night. The problem is
that today’s audiences are so jaded, so used to superheroes smashing buildings
in half, that when a film comes along about a gentle, friendly giant, an old
man who weaves our dreams together, then it’s considered too slow. Then the
films target audience tunes out. And it’s true, this is a slow paced film, but it’s
my opinion that this is exactly what Spielberg was aiming for, a sleepy sort of
fairy tale. So be ready for that kind of film.
What took me by surprise where the themes of the film. I had
no idea that this movie was going to be all about belief, faith and God. Oh
wait could the letters B.F.G. stand for the words belief, faith and God? Could
I be stretching it? I don’t think so, the films themes are fairly obvious. This
movie is quite similar to the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe books, they address
issues of faith, they push the idea of believing in a magical, eternal being
that’s watching over all of us, taking care of us, wishing goodness upon our
lives. That this magical being is there even though we can’t see him, that all
we have to do is “feel him” in our hearts. That all we have to do is take that
magical leap of faith, blindly believing the notion and that if we do, then he
will be there when we need him the most, when we are in pain, lonely or sad.
Thankfully, Sophie is inquisitive. After all her name is Sophie, an allusion to
philosophy which in itself means the search for knowledge which explains why
Sophie likes to ask lots of questions to the giant, like how old he is. The
giant tells her he’s an eternal, that he’s always existed, the biggest allusion
to God in the entire film, which is why there’s no doubt in my mind the giant in The BFG represents ‘God’.
Technically speaking, the film is amazing, the special effects flawless. The giants look truly gigantic. Spielberg here once again demonstrates his uncanny ability to work with children. Ruby Barnhill does an amazing job here playing Sophie, she comes off as an intelligent child, who likes to read and use her head to come up with solutions for any given situation. The problem with the film is that though Spielberg works great with children and has made some wonderful children’s movies like Hook (1991) and E.T. The Extraterrestrial (1982), I think The BFG is a tough pill for kids to swallow in terms of pacing; many children will undoubtedly find it “boring”. I was watching it in a theater filled with about 10 people and this woman kept telling her boyfriend she wanted to leave because she couldn’t understand what was happening on screen. That she was bored and this was a grown woman! She was pleading to her boyfriend to leave the theater! They did about half way through. I guess your enjoyment of this film will depend on your attention span. If it has a short fuse, you’ll probably walk. If on the other hand you have patience and can take a shorter paced film, you’ll probably stay and enjoy it.
2 comments:
I agree that the special effects were great in this film. The story isn't perfect, but I'm surprised to hear someone walked out on it.
- Zach
Yeah, this person just wasn't into fantasy movies, to her it was all too silly and at the time incomprehensible? It looked like she'd be more at home watching Fast and the Furious or something.
Post a Comment