The Vindicator (1986)

Title: The Vindicator (1986)

Director: Jean Claude Lord

Cast: Pam Grier, Maury Chaykin, David McIlwraith, Teri Austin

The Vindicator feels like Robocop’s cheap cyborg clone because so many of the elements seen in The Vindicator popped up again in Paul Verhoeven’s Robocop (1987) that you feel like somebody read the script for Robocop and liked it so much they decided to rush and make their own version of it before Robocop could be released. Could it be just pure coincidence that both films are so similar? I seriously doubt it. The proximity in release date makes me think that one copied ideas from the other, but who knows how that really went right? If you got any inside dirt, let me know! But if intuition serves me right, I’d say it was The Vindicator doing the rip off here. Now as far as 80’s sci-fi action films go, how was The Vindicator?

Story goes something like this: scientists are designing a cyborg meant for space exploration. The lead scientist in this project, a scientist named Carl wants to blow the whistle on a bunch of corporate douche bags who are stealing money from his funds. So of course, he gets killed for threatening to blow the whistle. So after they get Carl killed, they decide they want to use his body to create the prototype of their space cyborg! Which they do, unfortunately, because of a bunch of scientific bullshit that I won’t go into right now, the cyborg cannot control its emotions and simply goes berserk whenever anyone touches it. Yes my friends, simply touching it will get this bad boy to go on a city wide killing spree! Too bad for the evil scientists; Carl is hungry for revenge!  

The Vindicator feels like a mash up between Robocop (1987) and Darkman (1990) which makes perfect sense to me because both of these movies drew inspiration from the old Universal monster movies, mainly Frankenstein (1931). Did you ever see Robocop as a modern retelling of Frankenstein? I know I did! I mean, they take a dead guy, bring him to life, he is confused, he feels rejected by society, by loved ones.  These movies deal with becoming ‘a monster’. In these movies, the old question pops up: can a monster be loved even though he is a monster? Same as Darkman and Robocop, this is a monster that used to have a loved one before he was wronged, and same as these two movies, the creature goes back home to try and reconnect with his wife, only to find out she is now horrified by the way he looks.  As you can see, these movies have almost exactly the same plot. In Hollywood that’s called a formula, and it’s a formula that The Vindicator follows to a T.  

In films such as this, you’ll always find the monster looking at themselves in a mirror, or a puddle of water, and hating what they see, screaming in frustration. Kind of how like Darkman breaks down and cries when he takes a look at his charred hands and starts screaming “My hands! My hands! They took away my hands!”  The filmmakers also recognized their connections to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; by naming the project that the scientists are working on ‘Project Frankenstein’. And if you know your Frankenstein films, then you know the monster is always a misunderstood creature, society just wants it dead; which is really what this movie is all about, the bad guys trying to recover the runaway robot so they can erase their mistake. It reminded me of Short Circuit (1986), which also had the same basic premise.

The makeup effects were done by legendary make up effects man Stan Winston, this was one of his first films and I’d say that Winston’s make up effects are the best thing the film has going for it. I mean, The Vindicator looks fairly cool and there’s this scene where he takes off his mask and we can see a mixture between robot and human that was pretty awesome, I mean for the time it was made anyways. The big problem for me was that whenever The Vindicator walked, he didn’t make any robotic sounds, it was not as cool as Robocop in that sense. Also, the actor playing the cyborg didn’t move like a robot, he walked around like a regular human being, again, something that Robocop did better. Peter Weller had that robotic walk down flat! In the battle between The Vindicator and Robocop, Robocop comes out the winner because it is simply a better made film; obviously the talent behind the camera on Robocop was superior. The Vindicator sadly feels like a television show at times. The coolest thing you see The Vindicator doing on this film is lifting and crushing car with his hands, that’s about as amazing as this film  gets. The final fight scene, which involved The Vindicator fighting other cyborgs was directed in a very boring, boring fashion. Final words on The Vindicator: extremely similar to far better films and directed in a very banal fashion. If anything, watch it for seeing Stan Winston’s early work.  

Rating: 2 out of 5

Freejack (1992)

Title: Freejack (1992)

Director: Geoff Murphy

Cast: Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, Mick Jagger, Anthony Hopkins, Jonathan Banks, David Johansen, Amanda Plummer, Esai Morales

Freejack has an interesting idea behind it: rich people from the future steal bodies from the past seconds before they are about to die so that they can use these bodies to transfer their own consciousness into them and get a second chance at life, in a new body. So I guess we could say that in the future, rich people have discovered the secret to immortality. But what happens when one of these bodies resists being lobotomized and is fully aware of what’s being done to them? This is the premise for Freejack, a film based on the novel Immortality Inc. by Robert Sheckley. So yeah, interesting premise for a film, did the filmmakers pull it off well? Or is this another botched adaptation?

I haven’t read the novel, so I couldn’t tell you how well it translates from book to film, but I will say that the film has some interesting ideas behind it while still delivering some action. This is essentially a chase film, the kind of film in which characters are always running, jumping and escaping certain death. In that sense, Freejack is never a boring film. The film attempts also to infuse the proceedings with a hint of comedy, by this I don’t mean that it is ‘hardy har har funny’ but it certainly does have its fare share of one liners. Emilio Estevez plays Alex Furlong, the man on the run. While watching this film I couldn’t help and compare it a bit to Paul Verhoeven’s Total Recall (1989), which in my opinion is the film that Freejack is trying to imitate, at least in tone. The problem is that nobody could imitate Paul Verhoeven’s acidic sense of humor and so Freejack just comes off as goofy, primarily because its leading man doesn’t seem to be taking things too seriously, he seems to be having a good old time with all these people chasing him and cars exploding around him. The film has this uneven tone to it, is it funny? Is it serious? I guess the only guy to blame for this would be Geoff Murphy, the films director.

I don’t know whose idea it was to put Emilio Estevez in the starring role, but in my book he just doesn’t pull of a convincing leading man, he looks like somebody who’s just goofing around the set rather than somebody who is running for his life. I guess the only reason Emilio Estevez is on this movie is because he’d worked before with Geoff Murphy on Young Guns II (1990). But I could definitely see somebody else on the title role, somebody with a little more ‘gravitas’, cause Estevez just doesn’t have them. In terms of supporting actors the film is solid; we get Anthony Hopkins, Rene Russo and we even get Mick Jagger as a lackey and New York Dolls front man David Johansen in a small role. But with such a solid cast, where Freejack failed was in choosing Estevez as the leading man. He seems more suited for a silly comedy like Loaded Weapon 1 (1993) than a science fiction film like this one.

The good thing about Freejack is that it has plenty of action sequences, the only problem is that it suffers from what a lot of action films from the 80’s suffered from: the chase sequences feel like a check list of every car stunt known to man. So you're like 'oh they're doing the car flipping over and exploding trick', they definetly have a been there done that feel to them at times. Now imagine that with Emilio Estevez pulling a one liner every time a car explodes and you get the jist of the kind of action sequences you can expect from Freejack. Still, some of the car stunts are pretty cool, however unbelievable.

On the cyberpunk side of things we get the dilapidated society, with rich people living in luxury and the poor living extreme poverty. We get the element of transferring human consciousness into a computer and then using modern technology to transfer a consciousness into a new human body. So there’s that common element seen in many Cyberpunk films of the ‘ghost in the machine’, an idea that was recently seen in Transcendence (2014) and also in Johnny Mnemonic (1994). Cool part about this whole ghost in the machine business is that it lends itself for some cool computer graphics and compositions which might feel a bit dated, but I’ll be honest, still look pretty cool by today’s standards. We also get that idea that big corporations have taken over the world, which is a staple of cyberpunk cinema, the big company is the big bad guy.

Another fault the film has is that cars that are supposed to look ‘futuristic’ , don’t. This is something that so many low to medium budget sci-fi films suffer from, the cheap or clunky looking cars. Last time I remember seeing it was on Equilibrium (2002). The problem is that they convert existing cars by adding a couple of panels and a coat of paint. Then voila!, they call them futuristic, but god, on this one it’s so blatantly obvious that they are not. Not to the director: painting a military vehicle red does not make it futuristic! So yeah, you get these clunky looking cars, which are not cool. These are the times when I miss Syd Mead or Jean Giraud doing the conceptual designs. Conceptual designs are so important in a science fiction film, if you don’t pay attention to conceptual design, where the artist designs elements from the film to make them look functional and cool at the same time, well, you get the clunkiness. I mean, look at the cars in freaking Blade Runner! The freaking Spinners are so awesome! I wanted a Spinner! But I do not want any of the cars in Freejack. In the end, Freejack is a fun, fast paced films that has a couple of hiccups along the way but is still a fun watch in my book. I like those scenes with Emilio Estevez and Anthony Hopkins battling for their respective minds! Just don’t expect a masterpiece and you’ll be fine, this one is a glorified b-movie all the way!

Rating: 3 out of 5 

Transcendence (2014)

Title: Transcendence (2014)

Director: Wally Pfister

Cast: Johnny Depp, Rebecca Hall, Paul Bettany, Cillian Murphy, Morgan Freeman

Funny story with this movie: I went to see it on what Catholics call Holy Friday and on that day, actually that whole weekend, well, theaters where flooded with church religious folks going to see either God is not Dead (2014) or Heaven is for Real (2014). So I felt out of place going to see Transcendence which touches upon the dangers of religious fanaticism, from a more philosophical angle. Transcendence is a movie against religion, not for it. Funny part is that the theater that was playing God is not Dead was right next to the one playing Transcendence and both films were starting at the same time. The interesting part is that I could  see people entering in droves to God is not Dead while every once in a while, somebody would go into Transcendence and my first thought how this was all so symbolic of what goes on in the world. So very few people are inclined towards the philosophical, the thought provoking. 

I’m of the mind that religion is dying off little by little and that thanks to the help of the internet and social media, people are slowly realizing just how much of a fairy tale religion is. The powers that be know this, which explains the avalanche of religious flicks we’ve being seeing lately. It almost feels like a desperate attempt to inject society with religiosity again. The powers that be also control Hollywood and they know how to use it well. I mean, even Hitler realized the power of cinema to transmit his ideas! So anyhow, this avalanche of Christian movies is to me, the lowest type of religious propaganda, so sleazy, so obvious in its desperation. There could be another explanation for the recent onslaught of religious flicks: money. Religious people don’t need much to get all fired up and Hollywood knows it. This explains why a prejudiced film like God is not Dead is making money. Hollywood knows this is an untapped market, and it seems they now want to exploit it as much as possible. I mean, this month alone we had 3 religious themed films! And they all have these titles that make it obvious they have an agenda. God is not Dead….Heaven is for Real…I'm in Love with a Church Girl….these titles let us see the kind of ideas that they want to infuse into society. God isn’t dead no matter what your university teachers tell ya! Heaven is Real, look at this little kid who went to heaven...and when you marry, make sure she’s a church girl! What the?! What’s next? A film called Science is the Antichrist?  

I mean, it’s not like films about ‘not believing’ are so obvious with their titles. Just look at a film like Transcendence; there’s nothing to tell you that it’s a film about religious fanaticism, the themes are not blunt or in your face. The themes are not even implied in the films title! Nope, the films themes are hidden behind meanings and symbolisms; you don’t feel like you’re being preached to. With films like God is not Dead and Heaven is for Real, I feel like am being preached at from seeing the previews alone! So anyways, there I was, doing my part in supporting a philosophical film with interesting themes and intriguing cyberpunk elements which I am a sucker for, unfortunately Transcendence wasn’t a very exciting film. Sure it was philosophical, and sure it had interesting concepts which I was diggin’ for the most part, unfortunately it all builds up to nothing. I wanted a bigger bang for my sci-fi buck! Unfortunately the filmmakers weren’t all that interested in showing us anything amazing or mind blowing.

The thing with this movie is that it had all the appropriate elements to deliver something thought provoking and cool at the same time. The concept of artificial intelligence becoming sentient, fully aware of its existence is incredibly interesting to me. It presents us with the terrifying notion that computers might one day think, like us, or for us. It goes even further and plays with the ideas of transferring our consciousness into an artificial intelligence, so that it might duplicate us in a way, so that we might, in a way, live forever. Of course the logic behind it is a lot of bullshit science, the kind of science that they show us in films where complicated scientific procedures are explained away with a simple sentence. And that’s fine as far as I’m concerned, I don’t need things to be explained to me, this side of the film reminded me of the dream traveling technology in Inception (2010) which is never explained in the film. It’s like the famous ‘McGuffin’ , you don’t really need to know what it is, or how it works. What matters is how we go from point A to point B. Unfortunately point B in Transcendence takes us nowhere. Interesting concepts are presented but never taken to their full potential, I feel they could have pushed things a bit further, they played it too safe in my book.

The film kind of contradicts itself because it presents us with Will Caster, a scientist who has successfully transferred his consciousness into the internet. He follows all the steps that a cult leader follows in order to build his empire. He buys land, he builds a society apart from the rest of humanity, and then he starts attracting parishioners by promising them paradise. I couldn’t help but think about David Koresh and his shenanigans in Waco, Texas, or Jim Jones and his Jonestown in Guyana. The problem is that the character of Will Caster isn’t really evil; he creates technology that actually helps humanity. His creations would make the world a better place, so then why does the film make it a point to portray him as an evil religious leader? So which is it, is he the leader of a zombie religion, or is he the savior of humanity? It’s not just that this character has that duality to it; it’s just that the character contradicts itself. The film is a jumbled mess in my book. It’s one that wanted to play with heavy themes, but ultimately didn’t know how to develop them in the best way possible. I mean, we're even presented with the idea of living in a world where technology has dissapeared from the face of the earth, which would have made an even more interesting film, but alas, they only hint at it. 

Ultimately, the biggest sin this film has going for it is that it was not entertaining. The ending is so incredibly dull I was literally fighting to stay awake. I guess a lot can be explained by the fact that this film was directed by cinematographer turned director Wally Pfister. The problem with technical guys becoming directors is that they just don’t have that vision necessary to tell a story in an entertaining or visually interesting fashion. Just because you’ve worked behind the scenes all your life, doesn’t mean you’d make a good director. Sure there are exceptions, but more often than not, technicians and writers don’t always make good directors. Examples of this are Blade Trinity (2004), Virus (1999), Spawn (1997), Eragon (2006), all directed by writers and special effects guys who suddenly wanted to take a stab at directing. I’m not saying that Transcendence is a terrible film because it does offer us interesting concepts and at times interesting visuals, but aside from being dull beyond measure, it even has great actors in roles that go nowhere! Cillian Murphy and Morgan Freeman are next to useless here. To me, Transcendence feels unfinished or half assed; it didn’t push its concepts all the way. And those are some of the worst cinematic sins in my book; a missed opportunity every step of the way.

Rating: 2 ½ out of 5   

Cyberpunk Defined! Also: A list of Awesome Cyberpunk Films You Should Watch

A cyberpunk film usually takes place in a not too distant future that most of the time has been ravaged by man. In these films, the future is not a pretty place, most of the time society is portrayed as post- industrial dystopias, where technology has changed humanity, and usually not for the best. Landscapes are huge cities, urbanized areas, fake landscapes filled with artificial lighting, plastic and metal.

Cyberpunk films focus on the mix between man and technology; in these films man is almost completely dependent of it, in fact, in most of these films man has become one with technology. Often times these films present us with the idea of invasive modification of the human body; with characters that have mechanical appendages or implants connected directly to their brain that allows them to connect directly to computer systems, this last point is a huge landmark of the genre. 

Characters in these films are marginalized outcasts who prefer to spend a lot of their time connected to the internet, usually through a helmet or a cable that connects them directly into the virtual world. In these worlds, humanity has become so amalgamated that it’s all chaotic and crazy, filled with all sorts of social disorder; often times societies clash with one another in one huge smorgasbord of culture; usually on the brink of total breakdown. Society in cyberpunk films is the anti-thesis of the utopian futures sometimes depicted in science fiction films. The future depicted in cyberpunk films is dirty, messy and chaotic.

These films focus on loners, hackers that live on getting paid for performing all sorts of cyber crimes; crimes usually committed towards big mega corporations that have taken over the government. Many don’t understand where the ‘punk’ in cyberpunk comes from, but I’ll tell ya: the punk element comes from the outcasts of society that take center stage in these stories. Punk culture is usually associated with rebels, dissenters and misfits, this is why most of the characters in a cyberpunk film fall on this category. Cyberpunk films always comment on society and its many faults.   

Many cyberpunk films use the film noir style of storytelling, which is why sometimes these futuristic films will have an old school vibe to them, kind of like how Blade Runner feels like an old detective film from the 50’s when looked at from a certain light. A lot of these films take place during the night, in the big bad city. So anyways here I offer you my list of essential cyberpunk films. Hope you find something worth watching on it, most of these films are the cream of the crop when it comes to cyberpunk cinema. I’ve left out some that I haven’t watched, so feel free to recommend anything that comes to mind! 

Ghost in the Shell (1995)

Director: Mamoru Oshii

Comments:  Ghost in the Shell is all about an artificial intelligence that becomes aware of its existence and then decides to live out its life in the body of a cyborg; problem is this artificial intelligence belongs to the government and they want it back! Ghost in the Shell is extremely existential (like many Mamoru Oshii films are) and has many scenes of characters philosophizing about the meaning of life. On top of the films exploration of existential themes, we also get these awesome visuals and action sequences, all beautifully hand drawn; there’s just something about traditional Japanese animation that I can’t get enough of. To me, this type of traditional animation is what watching these movies is all about. Ghost in the Shell certainly ranks amongst one of the best Japanese animated films and consequently, is also one of the best cyberpunk films out there. One thing to keep in mind while watching this film is how much it influenced The Matrix (1999); a keen observer will notice how entire sequences in The Matrix were taken straight out of Ghost in the Shell. Mamoru Oshii, this films director, released another version of this film called Ghost in the Shell 2.0, which I don’t recommend you see because Oshii decided to splice in new computer generated sequences that sometimes completely replace original scenes; a huge mistake in my book because these new CG scenes don’t gel well with the traditional animation and simply stand out like a sore thumb. Stick to the original version of the film which to me is the best. Highly recommend you guys check this one out, it’s a masterpiece of cyberpunk cinema. 

Quote: “Incorrect, I am not A.I. My codename is ‘Project 2-5-0-1’, I am a living, thinking organism created in the sea of information”

Blade Runner (1982)

Director: Ridley Scott

Comments: Blade Runner is heralded as the crowning achievement in cyberpunk cinema and true, it does have many cyberpunk elements to it, but I’d say the novel is more cyberpunk than the film itself. Sure the film has to do with cyborgs, film noir and a decaying society, but the book dealt more with plugging yourself into cyberspace and drifting away into a new cyber religion called ‘Mercerism’; unfortunately, the film has none of that because Ridley Scott decided to do his own thing with the “adaptation” of the book, which is fine by me because while the film is not Philip K. Dicks book, it is still one amazing film with amazing production values, beautiful art direction and awesome performances. Oh, and let’s not forget Vangelis’s haunting musical score.    

Quote:  “Nothing the God of Bio-mechanics wouldn’t let you into heaven for”

The Matrix Trilogy (1999-2003)

Director: The Wachowski Siblings

Comments: When it comes to updating a genre, most filmmakers will look at every film ever made in the genre and then proceed to attempt taking the genre to the next level; this is something that for example Quentin Tarantino is known for doing. The Wachowski’s watched Johnny Mnemonic (1995) and Ghost in the Shell (1995) and then went and did their own big budget version of those, with their own twist of course. But the borrowing of ideas and scenes from both of these films is pretty hard to ignore, like for example, such obvious things as using Johnny Mnemonic himself for their own film. But there’s no denying the sheer awesomeness of The Matrix. Sure you’ve already seen it a million times, but looking at the film objectively, there’s no denying its importance within the cyberpunk/sci-fi world. It has dudes connecting themselves to the matrix via cables that connect directly to their brains, an obvious cyberpunk staple. Neo is the outcast of society who can’t seem to fit in…he’s a hacker dying to escape his boring life through technology. Basically, the Wachowski’s  took every element required in a cyberpunk film and put it in there; making The Matrix a quintessential cyberpunk film, not to mention the one with the biggest budget ever. In this sense, we could say that The Matrix is actually king of all cyberpunk films, simply because it meets all the requirements.  

 

Quote: “He is trapped in a place between this world and the machine world”

Johnny Mnemonic (1995)

Director: Robert Lungo

Comments: Out of all the movies on this list, I’d say that this is the one with the strongest cyberpunk visuals. I mean, this one is all about Keanu playing Johnny, a cyber carrier with a very important parcel; problem is the parcel is in his mind! He’s crammed so much data into his brain, that it just might kill him! The film has its visually impressive moments, I love those scenes where Johnny hooks himself to the system and drifts through cyberspace. The problem for me with this one is that sometimes it gets just a bit too silly (save the world but torture that poor dolphin!) and the performances aren’t the best. But putting all that aside, the film rocks for various reasons: it’s based on one of William Gibson first published works called ‘Johnny Mnemonic’ and even better, the screenplay was written by Gibson himself; which is why I can’t understand how some of the dialog comes off as cheesy and some of the situations as nonsensical. Also, the computer graphics are outdated as hell. But all in all, Johnny Mnemonic is still an enjoyable cyberpunk film, actually, even with all its flaws, a very influential one, just ask the Wachowski siblings!   

Quote: “Information overload! All the electronics around you poisoning the airwaves, technological fucking civilization! But we still have all this shit because we can’t live without it.”

Tetsuo Franchise (1989, 1992, 2009)

Director: Shinya Tsukamoto

Comments: Tetsuo: The Iron Man is a super nutso film, but trust me, you won’t be able to stop watching it. It’s all about this guy who gets hit by a car and then a piece of metal gets stuck to his thigh and for some reason he starts turning into a machine man? That’s the best I can come up with to try and explain this crazy ass movie. While watching it you’ll no doubt get Eraserhead (1977) flashbacks, because it’s in black and white and it’s about relationships. And it’s freaking weird. How weird, well, the dude is trying to have sex with his girl and suddenly grows a giant mechanical drill where his penis should be and well…just see it, you’ll know what I’m talking about once you see it. This film was followed up by Tetsuo II: Body Hammer (1992), but I haven’t seen it, so I can’t comment on it. I’m going to try and get my hands on it soon because it looks even more cyberpunkish than this one. There was also a third film called Tetsuo: The Bullet Man (2009); some people are not fond of it, but I liked it. The Bullet Man offers interesting visuals in the sense that it has a dude turning into a living machine gun thing that shoots bullets from every single part of his body, pretty cool concept if you ask me.  

Quote: “Together we can turn this fucking world to rust!”

Akira (1988)

Director: Katsuhiro Otomo

Comments: Akira is a film that complies with all the qualities of a cyberpunk film, it’s got it’s misfits in the form of a motorcycle gang that drives through a city filled with political and religious chaos and it’s got characters turning into huge creatures made of technology and flesh. It’s a film about the abuse of power, after all, what is Tetsuo if not a young man abusing his newly discovered telekinetic powers? To me Akira’s story is an analogy for that moment in life when we are young and find we have the choice of using our youth and energy for good, or channeling it for evil. Tetsuo looses focus and turns to the dark side out of sheer frustration, but is that the answer?  Bullying can be a bitch, but is the answer to kill everybody? Or do we have a choice? All these questions arise while the powers that be try to control and manipulate Tetsuo, the young boy with terrifying telekinetic abilities. In a way, this film is similar to Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange (1971), because it talks about learning to control our violent impulses, or the government will eventually come in and force us to control them. Better us at the controls then them is what I always say. One of the best animated films ever made.  

Quote: “Enough, open your eyes! You’re all puppets of politicians and capitalists!”

Videodrome (1983)

Director: David Cronnenberg

Comments: This movie was exploring cyberpunk elements at an early stage, even before cyberpunk was defined as cyberpunk! There’s these awesome scenes in which James Wood’s ‘Max Renn’ plugs himself into this giant helmet that’s supposed to connect him to some sort of information superhighway, even before there was such a thing as the internet; which makes the film prophetic! It’s one of those films in which science fiction becomes fact. Cronnenberg has always explored themes of flesh and machine becoming one, he went on to explore the same themes again in The Fly (1986), where Cronenberg squeezed in a scene in which the fly creature melds with the very machine that teleported it. In Cronnenberg’s Videodrome, a company is looking to create these glasses that will connect you to the internet, again, predating modern technology which is just now starting to take off. The main theme in this film is man vs. machine, which is why one of the films most famous lines is: 

Quote: “Long live the new flesh! Death to Videodrome!”

Hardware (1990)

Director: Richard Stanley

Comments: This is a low budget cyberpunk film, but still turns out to be quite a cool little sci-fi film from Richard Stanley, the anti-hollywood misfit director. This was Richard Stanley’s first film ever and it has the energy and creativity that can be found in first time productions, when director and a crew want to prove to the world that they can make a kick ass movie with little money. The film had the collaboration of a couple of filmmakers who went on to become big time directors like Chris Cunningham and Stephen Norrington. Hardware is a monster flick, not unlike The Terminator (1984). It also has a few elements from Blade Runner (1984), especially when it comes to the color palette. Hardware is very much a Richard Stanley film, weird and filled with social commentary. In a nutshell, Hardware is an anti-war film depicting a military robot gone awry. The film feels very claustrophobic (due to the small sets) which kind of adds to the end of the world atmosphere, which is extremely palpable. Cyberpunk elements are very strong on this one, this is a film filled with humanity in chaos, misfit characters with robotic hands, and a prevailing sense of nihilism. In the midst of it all…art thrives! A small film that achieved a lot with very little.    

Quote: “Machines don’t understand sacrifice, neither do morons”

The Terminator Franchise (1984-2015)

Director: James Cameron, McG, Jonathan Mostow

Comments: Cyberpunk elements are all over these films, but of course, the most blaringly obvious cyberpunk element is that the films are about killer robots that look human but are really cybernetic organisms with flesh over a mechanical exo-skeleton. It’s all about the melding of the human and the robotic. Also, these films are very post-apocalyptic, in these films; technology has grown sentient and has taken over the worlds military weapons! Computers destroy humanity with nuclear weapons and human survivors have to avoid deadly robots whose mission is to eliminate what’s left of humanity, squashing us like cockroaches. It’s also about misfits and outcasts, because John Connor starts out as a little misfit himself, stealing money from cash machines and hating his step parents. James Cameron directed the first two Terminator films, which are the best in a series that has tried to survive, but suffers from a constant change in actors, producers and directors; as a result the franchise feels disjointed. Not that Rise of the Machines and Salvation are bad, it’s just that they don’t reach the levels of intensity and awesomeness that Cameron’s first two films did. I’m looking forward to the reboot that is on the horizon.  

Quote: “The future has not been written, there is no fate but what we make for ourselves”

Robocop Franchise (1987-2014)

Directors: Paul Verhoeven, Irving Kershner, Fred Dekker

Comments: Robocop is the ultimate example of man and machine melding into one being, which of course is extremely cyberpunk . What I like about the Robocop films is how they are about someone trying to break with the programming that’s jammed into them by society. Robocop has many directives inserted into his system, but decides to reboot himself and clear his mind from all the bull crap, from there on in he becomes master of his own destiny, something I highly recommend! Another cyberpunk element the films have (well, at least the old ones) is that they are very much about a society that’s been overtaken by violence and crime, it’s a society in decay, society in chaos; an element that was sadly missing from the 2014 remake. On these films we get tons of cyberpunk imagery, like when the bad guys break Robocop apart and we get to see just how much of a machine Robocop actually is. Aside from all that, the first two films are awesome over the top action films, nothing like the watered down 2014 remake or the childish Robocop 3 (1993).

Quote: “Well, we got him on minimum life support, small electrical jolts to keep his brain alive. But there’s no telling how long it’ll last, he can go at any time”

Class of 1999 (1990)

Director: Mark Lester

Comments: On Class of 1999 society has become ultra violent and that violence translates to a hellish high school experience both for students and teachers. Fortunately the department of education has the solution to student violence: cyborg teachers! And these teachers aren’t just any old cyborgs, they got missiles for breasts and machine guns for hands! Slowly but surely the troublemakers in school learn their lesson, unfortunately, the robots are also part of a military operation and so when the robots detect problematic behavior from students, they take deadly action to make these students learn a lesson! An awesome bonus: Pamela Grier and Malcolm McDowell play two of the deadly cyborg teachers. This film is a spiritual sequel to Class of 1984 (1982), which by the way was made by the same director, Mark L. Lester.

Quote: “These things are like a bad, fucked up, George Jetson nightmare!”

eXistenZ (1999)

Director: David Cronenberg

Comments: eXistenZ is what we movie buffs like to call a “spiritual sequel”. It’s not a direct sequel to Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983), but it certainly feels like it exists within the same universe. Videodrome deals with societies addiction to television, sex and violence, three themes that Cronenberg just loves to play with in his films; eXistenZ is like that, but instead of filtering the themes through the age of television, it filters its themes through the age of video games. And so, this is a film about Allegra Geller, a video game designer who is about to release her new game called ‘eXistenZ’, which is a truly immersive virtual reality experience; you plug yourself in (through your spinal cord of all places!) and you zone out into the game, kind of like The Matrix (1999). But before releasing the game to the world, she has to try it out on a test group. Unfortunately, it all goes bat shit insane from there on in! People are killing for this new game! But why? The film addresses the issues of the flesh versus the virtual world. What is real and what is not? This is a characteristic of cyberpunk films, when the cybernetic world and the real world get confused and we don’t know which is which. Highly recommend this one if you loved Cronenberg’s Videodrome.  

Quote: “it’s worse than that, I’m not sure here, where we are, is real at all. This feels like a game to me. And you, you’re beginning to feel like a game character!”

Strange Days (1995)

Director: Kathryn Bigelow

Comments:  Strange Days feels like an update on the ideas presented in Douglas Trumbull’s Brainstorm (1983) because same as Brainstorm, Strange Days is all about hooking yourself up to a system that allows you to relive other people’s experiences. The problem comes when an important person gets murdered and the evidence is recorded by someone, then the whole recording becomes evidence to the murder, so in that sense, Strange Days is different to Brainstorm because it turns into a whodunit type of film. At the same time, Lenny Nero (Ralph Fiennes) is a character who is trying to cope with the loss of the love of his life. Will he continue to live in the past, or will learn to let go? At the same time everything happens with the turn of the century as a back drop. Staying true to its cyberpunk roots, the films main character is a misfit, a hacker who hustles recordings dealing with illegal activities; he’s also a junky of old memories and just can’t seem to live in the real world. Kathryn Bigelow will amaze you with her direction here, there’s this truly amazing opening sequence where Bigelow never cuts that will just blow you away. Here she was already displaying amazing vision as a director, demonstrating that she’s a powerful force behind the camera. 

Quote: “You can trust me cause I’m your priest, I’m your shrink, I am your main connection to the switchboard of the soul”

Avalon (2001)

Director: Mamoru Oshii

Comments: Mamoru Oshii loves cyberpunk, he’s made many films in this sub-genre including Ghost in the Shell (1995) and Ghost in the Shell 2: Innoncence (2004), but while those are amazing animated films, Avalon is live action, and it’s still very much a cyberpunk film. In this world, there’s this virtual reality game called Avalon and basically, you plug into it and zone out, same as many movies on this list. The film explores many of the themes explored in Cronenberg’s eXistenZ  (1999), but from a more futuristic angle. In this world you can go into the game and pass and make money, but if you die in the game, you can also die in real life. The films main character is a woman known as Ash, she’s the hottest player, no one can mess with her. Supposedly there’s a secret level that no one has ever reached and so she sets her gamer sights on it. She has to win! But is it attainable? Is that next level even real? Ash must know! As is expected of a Mamoru Oshii film, its existential and explores themes about life and the lies that exist within our society. On the other hand, if you’ve seen Mamoru Oshii films, then you already known this film is extremely slow, and meant to be enjoyed on a more psychological level. Interesting visuals and mood abound. Not for everybody, but if you love films with these themes, you’ll love it.

Quote: “What do you think is best? A game you think you can finish but never do? Or a game that seems impossible to win, but isn’t?”

Brainstorm (1983)

Director: Douglas Trumbull

Comments: Douglas Trumbull’s Brainstorm (1983) is all about a device that can record all your experiences (even your dreams) so that others can re-live them. When you re-watch someone’s experiences, you actually feel them and experience them exactly as the original person did. It goes without saying that it’s an incredible invention and of course, the government wants to get its paws all over it so they can start working on military applications for it. But of course, the scientists behind it want nothing to do with war and so a struggle ensues. The film plays with some truly interesting ideas and visuals, amongst them the idea of recording what happens after we die! Wouldn’t that be freaking cool? To have a machine that can record what we experience after we die? In deed many ancient questions would be answered. In that sense, this film might also remind you of Joel Schumacher’s Flatliners (1990). The film offers us cool visuals that might feel out dated, but at the same time might entertain just the same, the film deals with themes of marriage and rekindling of old passions. Can we remember why we fell in love with someone in the first place? Performances are good, we get Christopher Walken as the protagonist of the film which comes to us from Douglas Trumbull, the special effects artist who worked with Stanley Kubrick on 2001: A Space Odyssey (1969). 

Quote: “You’ve abused your privilege as a scientist and you’ve endangered your life. The thought of you playing that tape makes my skin crawl”

Behind the Scenes Awesomeness: Robocop (1987)