Hellraiser III: Hell on Earth (1992)
Director: Anthony Hickox
Cast: Doug Bradley, Kevin Bernhardt, Pala Marshall, Terry
Farrell
In the Hellraiser universe, continuity doesn’t really matter
much. They give you the illusion that there’s continuity because they’ll start
with a recap of the previous film, or they’ll mention some character from the
previous film, but believe me, it’s all an illusion. In the Hellraiser
franchise, each film exists within the universe that Clive Barker created but
each film brings its own characters in and eliminates anything established by the
previous film. By way of an example, just when you think Hellbound: HellraiserII (1989) is going to give us a bit of continuity because it brought back the
character of Julia Cotton, they go and kill her off, eliminating with no amount
of respect, characters and situations established on the first film. It seems
like the only constant in these films are The Cenobytes and the Lament
Configuration. Well, Hellraiser III: Hell on Earth (1992) does the same; it ignores
previous films, avoiding any sort of continuity and presents us with an
entirely new set of characters. How did this third outing in the franchise turn
out?
This time around, the lead Cenobyte a.k.a. ‘Pinhead’ is
trapped inside of a sculpture. How did Pinhead end up in a sculpture? Who put
him there and why? Never mind these questions because the filmmakers never
bother to answer them. You’re asked to accept the fact that Pinhead is a
sculpture now and that’s that. It feels like the filmmakers simply said “You
know what would look cool? Pinhead trapped in a sculpture! Let’s go with that!
I like it!” They didn’t care if this concept made sense or not, or if it fit
with what had happened to the character on previous films, they just went with
it. Then we are presented with J.P., the owner of a New York dance club called ‘The
Boiler Room’. J.P. also happens to be an art collector. One day, while visiting
an art gallery, J.P. stumbles upon the sculpture in which Pinhead is trapped in
and buys it. Little does J.P. know that he’s bringing ole Pinhead home with
him. Similar to previous Hellraiser films, you have to feed the demon in order
for it to become flesh. What happens when Pinhead is released from the
sculpture?
The idea behind this film is that hell will come to earth. Sounds
epic and grand don’t it? This epic premise was a giant red flag for me because
if there’s one problem I’ve always had with the Hellraiser films is that they
are big on ideas but small on budgets. As a result, even though their concept
might be grand, what they actually get to shoot looks cheap. Take for example
the premise for this film, what is ‘Hell on Earth’ reduced to in this film? Hell
on Earth translates to the main character running through a deserted city
street while man holes explode and fire comes out of them, a few windows
explode and that’s it; kind of small scale for “Hell on Earth” wouldn’t you
say? My point being there’s no grand scope to the concept even though it should’ve
been grand. You’re left wanting more, disappointed. Something all Hellraiser
sequels do.
Hellbound: Hellraiser II (1988) left us without our favorite
Cenobytes. For some reason the filmmakers behind that film decided to eliminate
everything that Clive Barker had established on the first Hellraiser film. They
killed off all the memorable Cenobytes from the first film, even Pinhead
himself! Yet here is Pinhead, alive and kicking on this film. Why didn’t all
the other Cenobytes return as well? I guess it was just an excuse to present us
with a bunch of new Cenobytes, which sadly are not better then the originals. Let’s
see, we get a Cenobyte that kills with the lens of a video camera that pops out
of his right eye. There’s a cd spewing Cenobyte which feels so out dated now
that CD’s are disappearing. Worst part is that these new Cenobytes are on the
film for only five minutes, they are sent back to hell in the blink of an eye…and
again you are left wanting. It’s as if they really didn’t think of interesting
situations to put these characters in. The main character (a reporter trying to
get to the bottom of things) gets rid of the Cenobytes so easily, that you
never feel she’s in any sort of peril. And we’re talking about 5 or six
Cenobytes with deadly weapons against one human female! It seemed like lazy
filmmaking to me, there was no intent to shoot something worthwhile. Cool make
up effects do not make a movie my friends. You need tense situations, you need
complexities.
Is there anything positive to say about Hellraiser III: Hell
on Earth? Well, not really. It feels like a lame-o sequel when compared to the
original first film. At least the second one entertained with the ultra gory
violence, which by the way is considerably toned down for this third entry.
That edge, that feeling of shock, of the forbidden is gone; it’s not on this
sequel. There are a couple of cool moments in the film, like when Pinhead walks
into a club and the Cenobytes start killing everyone in the club, but it feels
restrained. It feels like a wasted opportunity, that whole scene could have
been so much more. Okay, I did like those scenes in which Pinhead fights
himself. It’s like Pinhead the evil demon vs. the human side of Pinhead, who he
used to be before he became a servant of hell. That concept was cool. The film
does get sacrilegious at times; there’s a scene in which Pinhead walks into a
church and starts bashing down crosses and cackling away like a mad man, but sadly
these scenes amount to nothing but having Pinhead pose. The only purpose this
film serves is to show us exactly what a cash in is. It kind of makes sense that the director for this film is Anthony Hickox, during the 90's, he was one of the go to directors for cheap horror sequels like Waxwork II: Lost in Time (1992) and Warlock: The Armageddon (1993). Hellraiser: Hell on Earth
(1988) proves what I’ve been saying all along about the Hellraiser franchise, that after the first film, all Hellraiser
sequels have gone from bad to worse with each consecutive film. It’s a good
example of a franchise being treated like a cheap whore and being bled to death.
Rating: 2 ½ out of 5
I think if I remember correctly, in Hellraiser II, Pinhead was split into two parts; his human half and his cenobite half and the cenobite half ended up in the pillar of souls. That being said, pretty much agree with you on this one. I'd say of all the movies after 4, 5 for me was okay albeit more low-key and more cerebral.
ReplyDeleteSteve, you're right about Pinhead ending up on the "Pillar of Souls" at the ending of Hellraiser II. Yet neither film is clear on letting us know that this is what happens. The ending of Hellraiser II kind of makes you think that Dr. Channard kills Pinhead; but yeah, now that I put two and two together, I see your point. Yet, I wish both films had explained this in a better fashion, cause as it is, you're lucky if you even "get it". Thanks for commenting!
ReplyDelete