The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (2014)
Director: Peter Jackson
Cast: Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Cate
Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, Christopher Lee, Ian Holm, Luke Evans, Stephen Fry,
Benedict Cumberbach
This is the big conclusion to The Hobbit trilogy and they
obviously wanted to end the trilogy with a big bang, so of course, The Battle
of the Five Armies ended up being like the ‘Return of the Jedi’ of the Hobbit
movies, which is to say, the biggest and baddest of them all. It’s as if all
the action that was missing from the previous entries was taken out of those
and put into this one, one film to rule them all. The good news is you probably
won’t doze off during this one! The action is never ending, right from the get
go the film starts off with Smaug the Dragon destroying Lake town, and that’s a
real spectacle to watch. Now, I’m a huge fan of Dragons in films, and I have to
say that this is one of the best depictions of a dragon, ever. I say one of the
best because my favorite dragon is still and apparently will always be ‘Vermithrax
Pejorative’, the dragon from Mathew Robbins’ Dragonslayer (1981). Still to this
day, I haven’t seen a better movie about dragons than that one, but the dragon
in The Battle of Five Armies? Pretty freaking impressive.
In this the final chapter of The Hobbit saga we find the
people of Lake Town picking up their remains after in a fit of anger, Smaug the
dragon destroys their town. Good news is that after Smaug is slayed, the Lonely
Mountain is up for grabs, and if you remember correctly, there’s a huge
treasure of gold inside of that mountain! Since this legendary treasure is
common knowledge to everyone around, and there isn’t a fire breathing dragon to protect
it anymore, now everybody wants it! The elves, the dwarves, the humans and the
orcs! Everybody wants a piece of that treasure! But the dwarves are not willing
to give it up! This all leads up to an amazing battle that takes up practically
half of the film, which is why I say, this film is none stop action so strap
yourselves on tight for this one. It’s not a bore fest!
The only thing I criticize about these Hobbit movies is that
I feel they stretched them out for too long. Yes, I have read the book, and I
feel that the whole story could have been told in one, maybe two movies tops.
But of course, we can blame Hollywood for wanting to stretch franchises for a
few movies more, it’s the new trend in Hollywood. They’ll stretch “the final
chapter” into various films. They did it with the Twilight films; they divided
the last film into two, Breaking Dawn Part I and II…which creates a small
confusion because how can it be part I if this is the fourth film? Oh cause its
part one of the “finale” which they’ve now stretched into two films, simply to
make a few extra millions. You see Hollywood knows the fans can’t miss a single
chapter, because they know audiences are hooked on a feeling, like a junkie
looking for the next fix. They also did this with The Hunger Games, “Mocking
Jay Part I and II”. The thing is that you feel it, you feel that some of it is
just filler, padding to fill running time. They did it with this Hobbit trilogy
as well, which if you ask me went on for one movie too long, but whatever, this
final film is like all kinds of awesome because it’s monsters and wizards and
dragons fighting for almost the entire duration of the film! It’s a fantasy
film fans wet dream!
Imagine how much action this film has that it feels like it
doesn't have much substance to it. Good thing is that it still manages to pack
a wallop emotionally; it has one or two moments which “got to me” because you've
known these characters for three movies know, so you kind of grow fond of some
of them. I like that in spite of being a huge onslaught of action and special
effects, The Battle of Five Armies still manages to tweak your emotion chip, which
is something that Peter Jackson has always infused these Lord of the Rings
movies with: emotion; sometimes a little too much, but on this one? Just the
right amount of schmaltz.
Final words: if you are a fan of fantasy films and love to
see Wizards and Witches engaging in magic battles, fire breathing dragons destroying
entire towns, and monsters going to war, then The Hobbit: The Battle of Five
Armies won’t disappoint. I still wonder what these movies would have been like
had Guillermo del Toro directed them, at least he still gets some credit in the
writing department. I’m willing to bet that it was the studios who gave
Guillermo del Toro de shaft because they wanted that weight of saying that
these three films were directed by the same Peter Jackson who made the previous
Lord of the Rings films. That’s a huge selling point right there and I’m sure
they didn’t want to let that go, so they axed del Toro, even after he’d given
various years of his life in pre-production for these three Hobbit films. Del
Toro’s take on it was that he left because he couldn’t commit to these films
for six years of his life, especially when he has so many projects going on
with many different studios, which is of course entirely true. Still, Peter
Jackson pulled it off nicely and who better to these then the director who made
the previous three Lord of the Rings films right? I can’t help but wonder what
he’ll do next now that he’s leaving Middle Earth behind, I hope it’s something
every bit as spectacular. And to think Jackson’s career started with the low
budget indie flick Bad Taste (1987), a movie about aliens looking for human
flesh to sell in their own fast food chain! It’s funny, but even in his earlier
films; Jackson always displayed a
tendency to go over the top with his ideas, a tendency to shock as much as he
possibly could. If he was going to do a puppet movie then it would be the
grossest puppet movie you’ll ever see (Meet the Feebles (1989)) If he was going
to make a zombie, the it was going to be the bloodiest zombie movie ever (Dead
Alive (1989)) and if he does a fantasy film, then he’ll make you jizz your
pants with an overdose of monsters and wizardry. Can’t wait to see what he’ll
go over the top with next.
Rating: 5 out of 5
The dragons of post-apocalyptic 'Reign of Fire' were not bad either. At least they were biologically credible, while lizards with a pair of bat wings on their shoulders are anatomically not working and (just like centaurs, angels and succubi) must come from Barsoom or Kregen or whatever world where vertebrates have 3 pairs of limbs.
ReplyDeleteThe 1st movie of the trilogy was light-hearted and somewhat childish (rather in accordance with the book), the 2nd was lenghty (but Tolkien's writing are often so), the 3rd is the best, spectacular and at times enthralling. The authors had to add a *lot* to the book, but their additions are in my opinion judicious improvements. I really apprecaied to see Galadriel in full demonstration of her powers!
Agree with you abdul666, I loved that scene where Galadriel just goes batshit insane and banishes Sauron...wow, the sound effects on her voice during those scenes are pretty spooky. The visuals also make Galadriel seem almost evil, but no, there's no way she's evil,she's just powerful! I also enjoyed that scene where Galadriel, Saruman and Gandalf fight those ghosts, that was freaking cool.
ReplyDeleteI also liked the Dragons in Reign of Fire as well, but there's something about the dragon in Dragonslayer that feels real and tangible as opposed to the CGI creations seen in more recent fantasy films.