Title: Iron Man 3 (2013)
Director: Shane Black
Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle, Guy
Pearce, Jon Favreau, William Sadler, Miguel Ferrer
Review:
Iron Man 3 is exactly what it’s supposed to be when you take
in consideration that it’s directed by Shane Black. But who the hell is Shane
Black you might ask? Well, most movie buffs will know that he’s the mastermind
behind the scripts for such classics as Lethal Weapon (1987), The Last Boyscout
(1991), The Monster Squad (1987), Last Action Hero (1996) and The Long Kiss
Goodnight (1996). Mind you, I said he’s the mastermind behind the scripts for these
movies, not the direction, because that’s what Shane Black’s been doing for a
large part of his career, writing awesome movies. By the way, during the 90’s, Mr.
Black became Hollywood’s highest paid screenwriter! For The Last Boy Scout he
got paid a cool 1.75 million dollars, the highest any screenwriter had gotten
paid at the time. Then for The Long Kiss Good Night he got paid four freaking
million dollars! And it was a box office failure! After that huge failure, Shane
Black retracted from writing anything. Reportedly he wanted to get away from
associating himself with big budget movies. He then resurfaced into the limelight by
writing and directing the fast paced action comedy Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005)
which starred Robert Downey Jr, so it makes all the sense in the world seeing
them working together again for this third Iron Man film. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang was
Shane Black’s first directing gig, and it was a successful one. Now he says
that directing is what really gets his panties up in a bunch, he loves it. So,
here comes Iron Man 3, his second shot at directing a film, and his biggest
project to date, how did it go?
Iron Man 3 picks up right where The Avengers (2012) left
off, with Tony Stark dealing with the whole aftermath of saving New York from
an alien invasion and traveling through wormholes and all that. Apparently, Mr.
Stark cannot deal with the fact that he saved millions of lives and possibly
the entire planet from an alien invasion. Wormholes, demi-gods and aliens give
Stark sporadic anxiety attacks. The mere mention of anything related to The
Avengers or wormholes will get him all panicky. At the same time, there’s a new
villain on the horizon. One that wants to destroy America! Will Iron Man be psychologically
stable enough to battle his own demons and stop The Mandarin and his minions at
the same time?
Staying true to the kind of characters that Shane Black likes
to write, this time around Stark is an unstable protagonist. If you’ve seen
some of Blacks previous films, you’ll find that many of his stories have
protagonists who are unstable psychologically, angry and on the edge. I mean,
the best example I guess would be the first film he ever wrote; Lethal Weapon. On
that one we meet Martin Riggs, a guy who’s a borderline psycho. A guy who is
depressed because he lost his wife. Without her, his life is meaningless, he
doesn’t care if he gets shot, or dies, or what. In fact, the guy is downright
suicidal! Another example would be the main character in The Last Boy Scout; a
private detective called Joe. His daughter hates him and his wife is being
unfaithful to him with his best friend! It is sufficient to say he hates his life
as well. Bruce Willis goes throughout the whole movie looking all pissed off. And so when I see Tony Stark having nightmares
and getting anxiety attacks, it makes all the sense in the world because Shane
Black loves writing characters that are troubled and confounded that way. His
characters are always dealing with some terrible issue in their lives that doesn’t
allow them to be happy. This is the kind of Tony Stark you’ll be seeing in Iron
Man 3. How blue is Tony Stark in this movie? Well, to give you an idea, the
film starts out with the one hit wonder by Eifel 65 called “Blue (Da-Ba-Dee)”;
that’s how blue!
This doesn’t mean that Iron Man 3 is all gloom and doom,
because let’s face it, this is Disney, and they are not about selling gloom and
doom. So what we have here is a light version of a dark and gloomy guy, I know
that sounds like a contradiction, but it isn’t. This new Iron Man is a classic
Shane Black troubled protagonist, but he’s just not about to blow his brain out.
Tony Stark, though unhinged and delicate psychologically, still retains his
wits and good humor about him, as if trying to hide all these bad things going
on in his head. One of the elements I enjoyed the most about this Iron Man is
how it strips the character down completely. The film starts out by having Tony
Stark saying in a voice over, “you know who I am” this immediately lets us know
what the main theme of the film will be. The dissection of what makes Iron Man;
Iron Man. Is it his suit? Is it Tony Stark? Or is it a combination of both?
There are many visual indications that what the film is trying to tell us is
that it’s the man that makes the suit, and not the other way around. There’s
this idea behind the film that without Tony Stark, these suits would just be
clunky, clumsy things. There is an interesting duality to this character: the
suit represents technology and Tony Stark represents humanity and there’s this
clash between the two. They are trying to co-exist with each other, but it’s
not a perfect match. Well, at least not in this film. So this is why during
this film you will see Tony Stark relying less and less on his suit and more
and more on his cunning. This is probably the reason why throughout the whole
film, Tony is jumping in and out of the suit.
Black established a motif, a recurrent thematic element in
the film and it’s Stark, the human vs. the Iron Man armor. Though the suits are
helpful in many ways, on this film they are also shown to be imperfect,
failing, unreliable, a hindrance to Stark; some of the funniest moments come
from this. Shane Black decided to portray the suit like something similar to a
smart phone, you have to charge it if you want to use it, and sometimes when
you need it the most, it’s not charged! Or the battery dies. So be ready to see
one of these movies that turns its main character around. It turns its once
indestructible protagonist into someone vulnerable, confused and disrupt. They
used the same formula that was used for Skyfall (2012), in that film the
filmmakers took James Bond and made him a vulnerable mess. In Iron Man 3 they took the character, who is usually
indestructible and stripped him of all his gadgets and powers and left him with
the bare essentials, no additives, no preservatives, just pure unadulterated
Tony Stark. This might prove to be a bit shocking to those who expect to get
their usual indestructible version of Iron Man. In fact, you’ll see more of
Tony Stark then you will of Iron Man himself. Sometimes Stark will only use
parts of the suit instead of the entire suit. Or sometimes he’ll be working the
suit from afar, from remote control. Point is, Mr. Black purposely drew a separating line between Tony Stark and his armor.
But is the movie any fun? I say hell yea it is. Shane Black
might want to show us a darker, more disrupt version of Tony Stark, but he
still has to deliver the goods on the action and “wowzers!” department. So does Iron Man 3 deliver on the
action? I say the film delivers a fine balancing act between being character
driven, and exploring Stark on a deeper level while also delivering the show
stopping action. Case in point: the scene where they blow up Starks mansion is
a real grabber. So is the one that takes place in and out of Air Force One, then there's the climactic scene that takes place on an oil rig. We
get The Mandarin as the films major villain, and though he might not be what
comic book fans might expect, I thought he was still cool. I would have named
him something else other than The Mandarin, because he isn’t The Mandarin from
the comics. Its obvious Black was playing with our expectations of the
character. I don’t know why he chose to deviate so radically from what the
character is supposed to be, but for some reason he avoided The Mandarin’s
oriental origins and completely eschewed the ten alien power rings that he’s
supposed to wear on each finger. They
didn’t even include his superhuman martial arts abilities, though he does fight
good. The only thing that’s left from the comic book version of the character
is that he can slice Iron Man’s suit with his bare hands; so everything in this
movie is pretty much in order, save for the way they decided to portray The Mandarin. But hell, if you don't follow the comics, never mind. Then he's just a cool super villain.
In my opinion, Iron Man 3 is the best written of the three
films. It does a good balancing act between exploring what constitutes Iron Man and heavy doses of awesome
action. There’s a couple of new additions as well, for example, they went the
way of RoboCop 3 (1993) and added a homeless kid into the story. The kid becomes
Iron Man’s sidekick for a spell; which I thought was a good idea; it gives all the twelve year olds out there a character to
identify with, and at the same time, it gave Tony Stark the chance of becoming
a father figure. There’s more interesting developments and surprises, but I don't want to spoil them for you. Just make sure
you stick till after the credits for a little extra scene/joke that was pretty
funny. The film might disappoint some hardcore Mandarin fans, maybe the film
will disappoint those who want to see Tony Stark inside of the armor for 95% of
the film, but for those who want to get to know what makes Iron Man tick, for
those who get more of a kick from watching Robert Downey Jr. doing his thing,
well, then you’re gonna love this Iron Man flick.
Rating: 4 ½ out of 5
I wonder how much longer Gwyneth Paltrows gonna` be able to get away with pretending shes still 27 ! ?. Actually, come to think of it, i wonder how much longer Sarah Jessica Parker and Cameron Diaz are gonna` be able to get away with exactly the same deception ! ?.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Sarah Jessica Parker is getting away with it though, she's looking older and older in everything she's in.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Paltrow is trying to get away with looking 27 though, she's not portrayed that way in the film, she's not playing a twenty something? In Iron Man she's playing her own age, and looking quite good while at it I might add.
Now if she was playing a college student or something like that I might agree with you, but she's not.
Hey Francisco,
ReplyDeleteI came across your blog and thought it was really great!
We are inviting a select few contributors to Moviepilot, and would love to add you as a contributor. This would mean more recognition for your work due to the large community we already have here on Moviepilot, with 2 million visitors a month and 11 million fans on Facebook. We'd love to have you onboard, so let me know and we can get you set up.
You might want to check our Vampires channel here: http://moviepilot.com/channels/267739-vampires
You can find more information at: http://moviepilot.com/contribute and feel free to let me know if you have any questions.
Hope to hear from you.
Cheers,
Artem
Community Support | Moviepilot
artem@moviepilot.com
Pepper Potts is a comic book character. She's any age you want her to be. I think she's "supposed" to be anywhere from 25-35 in the comics, though. Depending on who's writing or drawing her. There's no problem with the Paltrow casting here.
ReplyDeleteLet's not forget the fact that Robert Downey Jr is also older than what age Tony Stark is "supposed" to be.
Artem: I'll send you and e-mail, sounds like fun.
ReplyDeleteLLJ: Agree, they both look good in their roles, just the right age if you ask me. Well, Downey Jr. is a bit over the hump, but he's aging extremely well, like fine wine.
Hey LLJ, i dont give a tuppenny damn about Robert Downey Jr, i just wanna` see Gwyneth Paltrow without her clothes on ! ! !.
ReplyDeleteI saw this last night at the theaters
ReplyDeleteand it was great!
To jervaise brooke hamster:check out mr skin.
ReplyDelete