Judge Dredd is one of those properties that has huge
potential for becoming the Next Big Franchise, but for some reason, Hollywood has
never really figured out how to start it up properly. There’s been two films
based on Judge Dredd, the first one was Danny Cannon’s Judge Dredd (1995) and
the second, Dredd (2012). Both films were not as successful as expected by
their producers, yet I have enjoyed both cinematic incarnations of the
character, both for different reasons. Still, one could safely say that
American audiences have not truly warmed up to Judge Dredd yet; both films were
failed attempts at jump starting a franchise. One of the best examples of a
failed franchise that Hollywood just won’t give up on are the Punisher films,
which Hollywood has attempted to start off three times with no success; and two
of these adaptations were produced during the current boom of comic book movies,
so why the failure? If you ask me, I’d say that no matter how how much
franchise potential a property might have, when a film like Green Lantern (2011)
fails it proves only one thing: you still need a good movie to kick things off.
Without that good first film, your franchise is going nowhere; which is why Danny
Cannon’s Judge Dredd is such a conundrum for me. Cannon’s Judge Dredd is not a
bad film in my book; actually, if you ask me, it’s quite the contrary, it
should have started a whole franchise of Judge Dredd films! Still, back in 1995
audiences in the United States didn’t think a Judge Dredd movie was such a good
idea, even with Sylvester Stallone attached as the main star of the film. Why
did this first attempt to bring Judge Dredd to the silver screen fail?
In retrospect, Danny Cannon’s 1995 film wasn’t a total bomb.
While it is true that the film failed to make its budget back in the United
States where it only made 34 million; it did make more cash abroad,
recuperating its 70 million dollar budget and making a grand total of 113
million worldwide. So things weren’t all that bad for this Stallone vehicle, it
just didn’t make as much money as expected in the United States. But still, one
has to wonder, why didn’t it perform? Well, it could have something to do with
Judge Dredd not being as well known a character as other popular comic book properties.
The roots of Judge Dredd go back to the U.K. where it first appeared in the
illustrious science fiction comic book magazine 2000 A.D., way back in 1977. Now
in the U.K. Judge Dredd is a well known comic book character, for example, it
was considered one of the top ten comic book characters ever created by Empire
Magazine. But the truth is that the grand majority of Americans don’t know what
the hell 2000 A.D. is and with the
exception of those hard core comic book geeks like myself, Judge Dredd simply
hasn’t reached that level of recognition that other comic book characters have.
So we could attribute the low box office intake to the fact that in the U.S.,
Judge Dredd is not that well known a character.
Judge Dredd has had a long and fruitful comic book life
But was Danny Cannon’s film really all that bad? Was it really
all that unfaithful to the comics? Well, if you ask Judge Dredd creator John
Wagner he’ll tell you that Cannon’s film “had nothing to do with Judge Dredd”.
I can see where he is coming from, but I don’t necessarily agree. I’ve been
reading the first issues of the old 1970’s Dredd comic books (and having a
blast with them I might add!) and I have to say that Danny Cannon’s film is
actually very close to what Wagner and Ezquerra originally created with their
comics. There’s Mega City One, which by the way looks absolutely stunning in
Cannon’s film. There’s a grand set design here, the city looks massive and
convoluted the way Mega City should be, filled with crooks and chaos. Judge
Dredd himself looks amazingly close to how he looks in the comics; the wardrobe
by the way was designed by famed fashion mogul Gianni Versace! The suit might not look functional, but hell,
it’s the Dredd from the comic books, there’s no denying that! The look for the
new film looses the giant golden eagle shoulder pads for a more toned down and
functional shoulder padding, but I have to admit, I like the look on Cannon’s
film better, it just looks more like the Dredd from the comic books. You can
tell there was a desire to be faithful to the iconic Judge Dredd suit, it only
he’d worn it more through the film.
They got the guns right, they got Dredd’s motorcycle just
as huge as in the comics and with built in machine guns! I tell ya, in look and overall feel, Danny Cannon’s
film succeeds in transferring the comic book character and the world of Mega
City One to the silver screen in a more successful and faithful manner than
director Pete Travis’s Dredd (2012), which by comparison brings us a very scaled
down version of Mega City One. This due to the fact that the makers of Dredd had
a smaller budget than Cannon and Stallones film. The makers of Judge Dredd had
a cool 70 million dollars to play with, some sites even say the budget was
closer to 90 million, while the makers of Dredd had only 50 million. But
apparently 70 million dollars could get you a heck of a lot back in ‘95 and as
a result, Cannon’s film looks expensive, it’s one of those movies where you can
see the millions up on the screen. It has big effects, big stars, and an
imposing musical score arranged by Alan Silvestri. So if you ask this film
connoisseur, I say Cannon’s film is better in these respects. It’s bigger,
badder, louder. Unfortunately, the films levels of violence garnered it an ‘R’ rating
and so, I think this too might have hurt its intake at the box office. Its
target audience couldn’t go and see the film because it was restricted.
Thematically speaking, the film plays with a lot of
important (if somewhat redundant) issues. First off, we have a corrupt judicial
system, corrupt cops and a corrupt government. Their main purpose in life is to
build an army so they can overtake the city. Same as real life politicians, the
corrupt government of Mega City One uses criminals to purposely inflict fear in
the hearts and minds of the people so they’ll have an excuse to build a clone
army. By the way, the theme of corruption amongst the police force is touched
upon yet again in Dredd. Cannon’s film centers around a story line from the old
comic books called “The Return of Rico”, where ‘Rico’ - Judge Dredd’s evil
brother- returns from exile to exact some revenge on those who sent him to
prison. Armand Assante, one of my favorite actors and one who is criminally
underrated in Hollywood, plays the over the top Rico, a great asset to this
film. And speaking of Judge Dredd’s cast, we also get the awesome Max Von Sydow
playing Judge Dredd’s father figure Judge Fargo. Sometimes the performances are
tuned up a bit too much, Stallone himself said that the tone they went for was
too ‘Hamlet’ when they should have kept it fun and gone more Hamlet and Eggs. I
get what he’s saying, but I actually think it’s not all that serious, there’s a
fine balancing act between serious sci-fi and goofy comic book movie on this
one, what with Rob Schneider hopping along for the ride, a joke a second is
always assured. True, I’m not the first to admit that Schneider doesn’t always
hit the mark, but in my opinion he isn’t all that annoying, he’s just the
a-typical comic relief character. If you want to blame someone for including
Schneider here, blame Stallone, he’s the one that asked for him! Originally
Stallone wanted Joe Pesci, but Pesci declined so they went with Schneider.
I’ve read many die hard Judge Dredd fans (the purists)
complain that they didn’t like the fact that Stallone takes off the helmet and
the uniform for most of the film, and I have to say I agree, taking the iconic
Judge Dredd suit and helmet off for 90% of the film was not a good idea. In the
Judge Dredd comics, we never get to see Dredd’s face, ever! It’s this big
mystery that bathes the character with an enigmatic aura that works like magic. But in the films
defense, we have to understand that Stallone was the big draw here and the
producers didn’t want to hide their bankable film stars face in a helmet for
the whole film, so in a way, it’s understandable that they did this. But I,
along with many Dredd fans would have preferred to see more of Dredd looking
like a Judge, not like Stallone. Wardrobe issues aside, Stallone did a good job
in bringing the character to life, he plays him cold and robotic, the way Dredd
should be. He shouts things like “I am the law!” and calls people “citizens and
perps”. He sentences people on the spot, I mean, for all intents and purposes,
this is Dredd come to life. I say you and I are lucky that this film turned out
as cool as it id, during this production Stallone and Cannon didn’t see eye to
eye in a great many things, yes my friends, this was a troubled production,
things didn’t run smoothly between actor and director. So much so that Cannon
vowed never again to work with big movie stars like Stallone. Still, I say that the end result is a fun
movie, with great action, a good story, a good cast and great visual effects,
Mega City One looks like something out of The Fifth Element (1997) mixed with
Blade Runner (1982). An escapist film with great production values, I say give
this one a second chance!
In comparison, Pete Travis’s Dredd is the complete opposite
of Cannon’s film. It’s a smaller scale story, less epic, more personal. We get
to follow Dredd and a rookie try and stop ‘Ma-Ma’, a big time drug dealer who
resides on the 200th floor of Peach Tree building complex. It isn’t
going to be an easy task, especially when Ma-Ma locks down the whole building!
By keeping Dredd confined to one location, the filmmakers keep costs down by
not having to show the futuristic exteriors of Mega City One, while at the same
time giving us more time to focus on Dredd himself, which is something that
sets this film apart, we are with Dredd for most of the films duration.
Gotta tell ya, if I’m given the choice to choose between
both of these films, I’d choose Cannon’s film simply because its way more fun. Dredd is such a serious affair, so dreadful, it needed something to liven it up,
it needed more sci-fi to it, more action, like the comics. As it is, we simply
get Dredd going from floor to floor shooting people in slow motion, which in my
opinion felt a little redundant after a while. I did like the slow motion
effect of Slo-Mo. Basically, once you take it everything around you slows down to a
crawl. Because of this, blood, shards of broken glass, bullets and tearing flesh, can all be appreciated in slow motion. Cool visuals in deed.
On this one, Dredd looks awesome as well. Yeah they
lost the giant golden eagle shoulder
pads, but it’s not a big loss, they went for a more realistic approach. Dredd
almost looks like a real cop, closer to something we might see on the streets
someday. But again, if asked to choose, I’d take the look from Cannon’s film
better, simply because it’s more comic bookish, it’s the Dredd of the comics,
not a toned down version that wants to be more realistic. This is something
that filmmakers need to remember, when we go see a comic book film, we’re not
looking for realism, we’re looking for escapism, we’re looking to see something
we haven’t seen. Characters who do things we can’t do. And in my opinion, this
is what brings Dredd down a bit, its desire to be more serious and realistic.
In a Dredd film, I want the futuristic motorcycle, the flying cars, the killer
robots, the cool weapons, the sci-fi, Dredd needed more sci-fi to it. But I get
it, the budget was smaller, this wasn’t as big a production as Stallone’s film
was, this is a smaller scale production, so I accepted it for what it is. And
truth be told, I enjoyed Dredd. I read
an article where Alex Garland speaks about this decidedly smaller scale film,
and in it he explains that they went with this because they were testing out
the waters to see if people would approve of this new film. Had this one worked,
had it made some dough, we would have seen two more films, bigger in scale with
the possible introduction of infamous Judge Death! But alas…this was not to be.
Unfortunately, Dredd bombed at the box office, even more so
than Cannon’s film. Dredd cost 50 million, but only made 32; it didn’t even
make its money back! That is the mark of death for any franchise. But again, you
need a good entertaining first film to grab audiences and this one was so small
scale that it failed to impress. Though well made, it simply wasn’t epic enough.
Dredd feels like a whimper next to the big and loud Stallone film. But I’m not
going down as saying Dredd is a bad film, I just think it wasn’t all it could
have been. Sad story in my book, I
wanted to see more of Judge Dredd! But fear not, thanks to the efforts of Judge
Dredd creators John Wagner and Carlos Ezquerra, Judge Dredd is becoming better
known across the United States and the world. The old comics are getting
reprinted and collected in these giant volumes that compile all of those old
Judge Dredd comics that appeared in 2000 A.D., highly recommend searching those
out! It’s very entertaining to see how this character has evolved through it’s
comic book history. Judge Dredd has gone through various comic book companies, writers and artists. For
example, DC comics has printed a couple of Judge Dredd series, and so has IDW Publishing, which by the way is currently printing a series as I
type this. Hopefully Dredd (2012) will find its audience on dvd and awareness of
the character will grow over the years. Until then, we got volumes of comic
book history and these two films to quench our thirsts for all things Dredd. Here’s
hoping that a couple of years down the line, Hollywood decides to give Judge Dredd
another chance at franchise glory. Until then, according to municipal code 213:
good hearted attempts at jump starting a franchise and Code 310: films that don’t
deserve the bad rap they get and Code 201 of the Cinematic Crimes Journal, I the
Film Connoisseur find both of these films NOT guilty! Go watch them and have a
good time!
Rating Judge Dredd (1995): 4 ½
Rating Dredd (2012): 4
A fan made poster that Danny Cannon made when he was a teenager, before he even dreamed of directing Judge Dredd (1995). He submitted it to a contest for 2000 A.D. and won!
At least Dredd is selling HUGELY with DVD sales! It just might get a sequel yet! As for Judge Dredd, I haven't seen it since I was a kid. I'll have to change that as soon as possible!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, a little while ago I mentioned doing a review of Jean Rollin film Rape of the Vampire, which you seemed interested in reading. It isn't up yet due to things like Christmas, subtitle troubles, procrastination, general business, and that I'm doing it as a quadruple Rollin film review with others in his filmography! (Which include's Zombie Lake! Uh-oh! haha!)
The thing I always loved about the Judge Dredd comic book (and all 2000AD strips) was the satirical sense of humour it had. Particularly in the early issues. Stuff like mad Chief Justice Cal appointing a goldfish as his deputy. Or the rival Burger King and McDonald gangs that Dredd meets in the Cursed Earth. And the way all the Blocks were named after random 20th century celebrities.
ReplyDeleteI really missed that aspect in the 2012 film and didn't enjoy how seriously it took the concept of the Judges. For me, the world of Mega City One should be a exaggerated, parody of the future. For all the 1995 film's faults (taking off the helmet, in particular, and also cutting a potentially awesome clone fight at the end) I still prefer it to the recent one because it took itself less seriously and had more fun with the material.
The problem is that no studio will finance a crazy violent film with a silly satirical vision nowadays.
I think if the Dredd DVD sells really well we might get a DTV sequel but doubt we'll get another theatrical film for many years.
Chris: Let's hope you are right! Id love to see another Dredd film! Looking forward to your review of Jean Rollin movies...next week I'm posting one for Lips of Blood which I enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteJack: I bought the first two volumes of "Judge Dredd Complete Case Files" and I've been having a blast reading these comics, I see stories that remind of other films I've seen like Total Recall, The Running Man and even The Terminator films.
There's a story about a machine that makes your dreams come true, a story about a robot war, where robots become conscious and rebel against "the fleshy ones" and a story about a talk show where people get killed! I'm just getting started on the "Return of Rico" storyline...it's interesting to see how many elements from the comics made it into these movies.
Agree, thats why I liked the 1995 film a bit better it has a bit of that parody into it. For example, there's this moment when Judge Dredd is passing sentence on Fergie and a robot passes by and says "eat recycled food, its good for the environment, and OK for you" ha ha...hilarious stuff.
I too was looking forward to a clone fight at the end, the clones even wake up...but nothing comes of them...that sucked! But thats basically the only think I didn't love that and the helmet thing.
You know who would've directed a good dredd film with tons of satire in it? Terry Gilliam! I got a feeling he would have done Judge Dredd justice, most of his films have that satirical tone to them, it would have fit perfectly with the world of Dredd!
I dunno, the Stallone DREAD is too funny, too silly and it just didn't feel faithful to the comic book. I guess, look-wise it is but that's about it. Sure, there's the taking off of the helmet which was a big no-no, but also the inclusion of Rob Schneider as comic relief was a big drawback to this version and why I prefer the 2012 incarnation more.
ReplyDeleteYeah, Pete Travis' take is much more serious but why not? If they went the satirical route they'd be accused of ripping off Stallone's version and the filmmakers of this new film made it pretty clear that they wanted to go a completely different way with this new one and I'm glad they did. Karl Urban is a vastly superior Dread. I like his channeling of Clint Eastwood and Olivia Thirlby was a pleasant casting against type.
I think if you wanted to get closer to the darkly satirical vibe of the comic book may be make it closer to the vibe of something like FIGHT CLUB which was hyper violent but also wickedly satirical without being too goofy.
The satirical tone and the silliness would actually go in tune with the comic book, the source of all things Dredd. Rob Schneider was a comic relief, he wasn't really needed, this is true, but then again you should check out this little robot that appears in the comic book called Wally the Robot, now there's a silly side kick! Not to mention that in the comic book Dredd actually has an Italian cleaning lady that actually cooks Italian food for him! I guess I didn't find that comedy so strange because of the characters comic book stories which always had that tone.
ReplyDeleteThough it looks to me like the comics got darker and darker as the years progressed, I've yet to read the newer Dredd tales, which I will be getting into soon.
I did like Karl Urban as Dredd, true, he is better as Dredd than Stallone ever was. STallone needed to be a bit more like that in his version.
Glad to see other people like the original JD, remake was good but Stallone is a boss
ReplyDelete