Title: Oasis of the Zombies (1982)
Director: Jesus Franco
Review:
There are a couple of zombie movies out there that
are complete bore fests in which very little happens in the way of action or
suspense. It seems to me that filmmakers who do these types of films make them to make some quick cash, so they can move on
to something else they want to do. The trick to making money with these types
of movies is to make the cheapest possible zombie movie you can and I mean
really cheap, all talk, no action, no gore, and very little in the way of make-up
effects work, this way you spend very little in making your film and have a
better chance at making back your budget. Then, the second part of the plot involves
making the masses believe they are going to see a zombie fest, the greatest
zombie film ever made. This is usually achieved by getting a really cool poster
for your shitty film and by cutting a trailer that shows only the zombie
scenes. Normally what we end up with in this type of situation is a really
crappy film, but a cool as hell poster. Most of the time, the poster is better
than the film. Then sit back and wait for the ka-shing!, if all goes well, you’ll
have made your money back because once you’ve managed to get your audience in
the theater seats, they have already paid the ticket; their money is yours! The
most notable example of this type of sleazy filmmaking would be the Nazi zombie
film Zombie Lake (1981) and the film I’ll be talking about today: Oasis of the
Zombies (1982), which consequently is also a Nazi zombie film; barely anyways.
This film concerns a rich kid named Robert whose
father is killed in Africa after he reveals the location of a treasure to some
greedy bastard. When Robert reads into his father’s diary he discovers that his
father actually knew the location of a gold treasure worth six million dollars,
a treasure that used to belong to the Germans, but they all died in a firefight
defending the gold, so know the gold is supposedly still buried somewhere in an
Oasis in the middle of the African desert. So Robert decides that taking his
friends with him on an expedition to find the gold will be a great idea! So
much for mourning the death of your father! So anyways, these kids take off for
Africa to get the gold, unfortunately for them, Nazi zombies are protecting the
gold! Will they find the gold, or will they instead find themselves?
Here’s a question I often times ask myself when
watching a film like Oasis of the Zombies, when filmmakers make a movie like
this one, do they know they are making an extremely boring movie? Are they even
aware of it? Are they making a boring film on purpose? Or do they think they
are actually making an entertaining flick? Thing is that this movie actually
has an interesting premise and back story to it, but it somehow still manages
to deviate into an extremely boring movie. For example, the movie starts out
with these two hot chicks stopping at the titular Oasis to refresh themselves,
and since the camera focuses very sleazily on their bee-hinds, you get to
thinking cool, we’re gonna get some hot lesbo action. This isn’t a chavanistic
thought on my part, I only come to this conclusion because this is a Jesus Franco film,
and Lesbo action is one of the elements his films are known for. So anyhow, you
figure these two chicks are gonna get naked and THEN get eaten by zombies. A
very similar scene happens in Zombie Lake as well, and since the same filmmakers
are involved in this film I thought they’d go with the same ‘modus operandi’,
but no, we only get a pair of zombie hands emerging from the sand and attacking
the girls. Worst part is the whole attack happens off camera! So right there and
then we know, this movie is shying away from showing us the goods in more ways than
one, no naked chicks and on top of that, no zombies.
This flick was seriously trying to cut back on costs
in another way: the zombies only come out at night for some reason that’s never
mentioned in the film. But I’ll tell you the reason: they only come out at night because it’s an
effective way for the filmmakers to hide a lot of the cheap make up effects or
even better, it’s an effective way to hide the fact that there’s no make up
effects whatsoever! For some shots they simply show ominous looking shadows
walking about! Wow, so I’m no Jesus Franco expert, but this must not be his
best film. There’s huge gaping plot holes on this one, for example: fine, there’s
a lost cache of gold somewhere in the dessert and the Nazi’s who it used to
belong to are now zombies…who guard the gold…for what purpose? This is the same
question I asked myself when watching John Carpenter’s The Fog (1980). Fine,
the ghosts are hiding in the fog, but what do they want the gold for?
What exactly are they planning on buying from the afterlife? Same question I
got about these Nazi zombies! And why did they turn into zombies? It’s as if
Franco simply wants us to take for granted the whole Nazi Zombie premise, because it’s a sub-genre, and
Nazi zombies simply are? Come on, that’s some lazy writing right there, if
there was even any writing involved, which by the looks of things I seriously
doubt.
Funny thing about this poster for Oasis of the Zombies, there are no tanks, no graveyards, and no zombies shooting guns in this movie! At all!
It doesn’t surprise me that this ultra cheap-o
zombie movie was such a bore, it was written and directed by Jesus Franco, the
same guy who wrote Zombie Lake, the most boring zombie flick I’ve ever
seen. I guess I knew going in the kind
of film I was getting myself into, and I was absolutely right. I’m still going
to watch some Jesus Franco films, Vampyros Lesbos (1971) looks good, and I’m
sure Franco has some more good ones in his roster, but Oasis of the Zombies was a complete disappointment.
It does have a couple of cool shots of zombies walking in the dessert dunes,
and some of the zombies are cool looking, but these few scenes do not save the
film from what it is: a complete waste of time. I gave it the benefit of the
doubt and it failed to surprise, shock, or entertain, three things a zombie film
should always aim to do. My advice is skip this one, you’ll be doing yourself a
favor.
I want to bugger Lina Romay (as the bird was in 1972 when the bird was 18, not as the bird is now obviously)
ReplyDeleteObviously!
ReplyDeleteIt is a bit of a shame that this one of the only Franco most people have any exposure to... because it really is a complete turd. Granted, I still like it infinitely better than Zombie Lake...
ReplyDeleteSpot on review.
Yeah, I believe this is actually my first Jesus Franco film, I of course know that he has better films on his repertoire so I will give those a chance, any suggestions on where I should start, I'd be glad to hear them!
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting!
Yeah my old mate, "The Fe-girl Vampire" (1972) for starters (if you haven`t already seen it or reveiwed it of course), with the afore-girl-tioned and quite astonishing Lina Romay when the bird was 18 and at the absolute pinnacle and peak of her physical attractiveness and desirability. When that bird was 18 she was arguably one of the most incredible birds of all-time, no question about it ! ! !.
ReplyDeleteFrancisco, i apologize that this doesn`t relate to the current post but i just watched "Nights of Cabiria" and "La Strada" on YouTube and fell madly in love with Giulietta Masina. What a sweet, sweet, sweet little bird she was when she was younger, an absolute little dream-come-true.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the recommendation Jervaise, I look into that one and other Franco films.
ReplyDeleteJ.J. Wistfulness: Both films are some of the best Fellini movies I've seen, he's older ones are more touching, more emotional then he's later work, which became more symbolic and surreal. My favorite ones so far have been the ones you just mentioned, glad you enjoyed them, I reviewed Nights of Cabiria a while back, here's the link for the review:
http://filmconnoisseur.blogspot.com/search?q=Nights+of+Cabiria
Francisco, it was actually reading your reveiw of "Nights of Cabiria" that made me go over to YouTube and watch it. The ending of the film is so sad and her look to the camera has to be one of the most heart-rending moments in the entire history of cinema. I was just wondering though how you could possibly describe the film as life-affirming ?, for me it was gut-wrenching and murderously painful to endure (although it is still an astonishing masterwork of world cinema obviously), i just wanted to climb into the computer screen and save her from the hell-on-earth that she was living in. By the way, i haven`t seen that many of Fellini's highly acclaimed other films but i somehow doubt that any of them would be in the same league as "Nights of Cabiria".
ReplyDeleteHey J.J., I think it would be good if we continue this conversati on my review of Nights of Cabiria...
ReplyDeletehttp://filmconnoisseur.blogspot.com/2010/01/nights-of-cabiria-1957.html