Title: Chernobyl
Diaries (2012)
Director: Bradley Parker
Cast: Jonathan Sadowski, Nathan Phillips, Jesse McCartney, Devin
Kelley, Olivia Dudley, Dimitri Diatchenko, Ingrid Bolso Berdal
Review:
Chernobyl Diaries comes to us from producer Oren Peli, the
guy who burst into the cinematic scene with Paranormal Activity (2007), one of
the most profitable independent films ever. It stands proudly next to similarly
produced films like Halloween (1978) and The Blair Witch Project (1999), you
know, films made with very little money, but that made huge amounts of cash at
the box office. It seems to me that Oren Peli is now Hollywood’s go to guy for producing
films of this nature, and of course Hollywood is loving every second of it. It
means they don’t have to spend obscene amounts of money producing a film and
they still fill up their bank accounts. Case in point, Chernobyl Diaries, the
latest of these ‘cheaply’ produced films only cost 1 million dollars to make, that's pocket change when it comes to hollywood, but hear this, the
film has already gone on to make more than 18 million dollars at the box office! Talk about a win-win
situation! But production stories aside, was the film worth a damn?
Story is all about these American tourists who in search of
kicks during their visit to Ukraine, agree to go on an ‘extreme tour’ which
means they’ll pay an ex-military dude to take them deep into the city of Pripyat,
the city where the families who worked at the Chernobyl Power plant used to
live in. After the 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power plant disaster; the whole city became one big deserted place. The
families who lived there were all forced to abandon the city in less then 24
hours! The buildings they used to live in stand their, like giant silent
witnesses to these horrible events that occurred some 25 years ago. Still, the four
Americans think going into this ghost town will be a spooky adventure. Never
mind that radiation levels are still present and could potentially kill them,
their logic is they will be in and out of this place before the radiation can
harm them. Still, this being a horror film, well, the question inevitably
arises: will they ever return?
Chernobyl Diaries attempts to be an exercise in suspense, but does it succeed? Well, the film is all about things moving in the shadows, villains
we can never quite place, but know are there, people running from deadly not yet seen..things. Yup, Oren Peli is up to his
old tricks again. He enjoys scaring his audience without really showing them
anything. This film is similar in that way to Peli’s own Paranormal Activity, a
film that can also creep you out, simply because it messes with your mind. The
villains in Chernobyl Diaries are kept in a shroud of mystery; obviously Peli knows our
minds will fill the blanks with something maybe even more awful. Maybe this is
a way to save some money, but I guess their logic is that our imaginations will
put in the special effects. Cheap, yeah, but you have to admit, it’s an effective
technique that when it works, it works. Your mind does fill in the blanks with something perhaps
even more sinister then what they could actually end up showing you. And though
Peli didn’t personally direct this film, you could feel that Chernobyl Diaries
is structured and produced in an Oren Peli sort of way. There’s lots of
mystery, lots of suspense, lot's of unanswered questions. This film keeps you guessing to the very end, which
of course I enjoyed.
This is director Bradley Parker’s first film, he’s worked on
films before but on the visual effects department and computer animation which
usually spells disaster for a film in my book. Virus (1999) and Spawn (1997) are examples of two films directed by visual effects artists who had the opportunity to make full length feature films. As you can see, the results are usually either empty fx spectacles or simply mediocre films. Sometimes handing a movie to an effects whiz isnt always great because they tend to focus on effects alone and forget about telling a good story. Sometimes their films don't work, and sometimes it's magic, like in the case of James Cameron, who started his career doing effects work on Roger Corman movies and has ended up directing some of the biggest blockbusters ever conceived. So you see, there are
exceptions and I’d say that Bradley Parker is one of them. Considering his
background in computer effects, I’m amazed he turned in a film whose focuse isn’t
in wowing us with them. This films main attempt is to scare us and keep us in
suspense and I think in that sense it worked. Visually speaking, thanks to Parker's experience with effects work , this film looks great. In the film, Parker mixes a bit of that shaky cam technique, but at the same time, has some good looking still shots, so I'd say he did a great balancing act there. Nothing worse than an overdose of shaky cam. Interesting how Parker’s first film has sparked some controversy, some groups consider the film offensive because it portrays kids going on
vacation to Chernobyl ,
where so many human lives where lost. They also criticize the films tag line “Experience
The Fall Out” because they say its "making fun" of the horrors of real nuclear
fall out. I say baloney, in any case, the film actually shows us what real fall out can
do to you. And as for the disrespectful angle, these kids go in there, not to
be disrespectful, in fact, their attitude is mournful. They stand in awe of
this place. If you ask me, the ‘controversy’ behind this is stupid, but on the
other hand, it should work in the films favor at the box office.
What works so well for this movie is the unique locations in
which they shot the film. We get isolated abandoned buildings, old factories, a
ghost city with shadows creeping in its backgrounds. The whole story behind the
Chernobyl disaster makes everything all the more sinister, the idea that these
kids are venturing deeper and deeper into this ghost town, that’s so close to
an abandoned nuclear reactor is very eerie, the visuals are extremely
atmospheric and I enjoyed that about it. My problem with the film was that
somewhere around its middle part it turns into the kids running away from something
they can’t see, and it turns into that kind of a movie where they never show
you what it is that’s chasing these kids, which is probably a way of trying to
augment the suspense. It might unnerve some, and piss off others who want to
see their creatures. It worked well in my book because usually, these types of
films have a good pay off in the end and in my book, Chernobyl Diaries does
have a good ending. Ultimately, Chernobyl Diaries has suspenseful moments, lot’s
of jump scares and an extremely eerie location and premise. It might not offer
up a lot in the originality department because it simply deludes into a monster
movie, but if you ask me, even though the film doesn’t break any new ground in horror,
it entertained me. It’s a horror film with an interesting setting and an eerie
premise, what’s not to like?
This one is destined for cult status, no question about it.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this review. I've been curious about this one. I do like found footage horror films and this one looked promising. It reminded me of an ep. of that SyFy Channel reality show DESTINATION TRUTH where they actually went to Chernobyl to investigate reports of hauntings. It was a very spooky ep., just to see footage of them wandering around this completely deserted city.
ReplyDeleteA lot of people (including myself) mistake this one for a found footage film, but it isn't. It only has one scene where they find a cell phone and look at this video in it, but thats about it, the rest of the film is shot like a normal movie, with a lot of hand held shots, which give it a documentary feel, but it aint found footage like say Blair Witch Project or Cannibal Holocaust.
ReplyDeleteI love found footage films though...last one I really enjoyed was Apollo 18, so underrated in my book!
Chernobyl is so fascinating. I really want to visit. I think time is running out to do it while it is still in this deserted state-- because it's becoming more and more touristy.
ReplyDeleteSo is chris dead he ends up getting attacked then leaves the film later leading up to him to be alive with his brother keep on saying I need to get chris. His ring later to be found but chris is nowhere to be found its sad if he's dead to not show how he died... it was a good movie but he should of had a good death in the movie.
ReplyDelete