Title: The Punisher (1989)
Director: Mark Goldblatt
Writer: Boaz Yakin
Cast: Dulph Lundgren, Louis Gossett Jr., Nancy Everhard, Jeroen
Krabbe
Review:
Sometimes a movie just doesn’t take off for all the wrong
reasons. Sometimes, like in the case of Mark Goldblatt’s The Punisher, a film
will die a quick and ugly death at the box office, not because the film is bad,
but because the studio that backed it up is going down the drain. The studio in
question was New World Pictures; a studio that was going bankrupt during the
time The Punisher was being made. It was
going through one of those name change things, where one company buys the other
and so they end up changing the companies name. Goldblatt’s The Punisher
suffered promotion wise and release wise because of this. It wasn’t released
theatrically in the U.S. ,
but it did receive theatrical releases around the world, which is how I got to
see it in theaters, because I live in Puerto Rico .
Lucky me; this is after all, the one and only Punisher movie that’s worth a
damn, so far anyways. I didn’t enjoy Jonathan Hensleigh’s The Punisher (2004),
that’s the one with Thomas Jane as the titular character. I thought Thomas Jane
was the worst choice to play the character, not because I don’t like Thomas
Jane as an actor, but because he didn’t look the part. He didn’t look tough
enough, plus, Travolta was weak as a villain and the film itself, it just didn’t
do it for me. Punisher: War Zone (2008), I need to rewatch because I can’t
remember much of it; but I do remember thinking that Punisher looked just right
on that one, and that the action and violence was brought up a couple of
notches. But for me, this 1989 version is the closest they’ve ever gotten to
capturing the gritty, violent nature of Frank Castle.
The story is about Frank Castle going up against the Yakuza
a.k.a. The Japanese Mafia. You see, the Yakuza wants to take over the whole
drug operation in the city and they are asking for a huge cut of the earnings.
Of course, the established drug lords of the city don’t like the deal that the
Yakuza’s have set upon the table and so they decline the Yakuza’s offer. But
the Yakuza’s won’t take no for answer, so in order to make sure the drug lords
will all cooperate; the Yakuza’s kidnap the druglords kids and hold them as
hostages! The Punisher a.k.a. Frank Castle, takes it upon himself to save the
kids and destroy the Yakuza. Will he be able to do it?
What I like about this film is that it doesn’t focus so much
on The Punisher’s back story, they don’t show us how he became The Punisher, on
this film he just is The Punisher. We meet him when he has already set up camp
in the sewers of the city, living in darkness and filth. What little we do see
of his past we see in flashbacks, so the story doesn’t necessarily center
around an origin story like so many comic book movies do. When he is not
fighting crime, The Punisher likes to pray to God, while looking at pictures of
his dead family. He asks god questions like: “Come on God, answer me. For years
I’m asking why? Why are the innocent dead and the guilty alive? Where is
justice? Where is punishment? Or have you already answered, have you already
said to the world, here is justice, here is punishment. Here…in me?” This is
really the best thing about this film; they portrayed The Punisher as this lost
soul, completely devoid of emotion or the ability to enjoy a normal life. He is
a man drowning in sadness and revenge. Lundgren’s Punisher is bitter, angry,
depressed, you kind of get the feeling he’s on a death wish. This is the way
that The Punisher should always be portrayed, the man is fueled by hatred for
criminals, he is not a clean cut, nice dude. He is a few bullets short of
blowing himself away. A far cry from the relatively wimpy version we got on The
Punisher (2004). For me, Lundgren was the perfect Punisher; he doesn’t talk
much but you can just see that hatred bursting out of every pore.
So you guys know me, cinematic violence and action equals awesome.
Not that I’m a violent person myself (actually far from it) but movie violence
is entertaining for me, the more excessive the better; and on that note, Goldblatt’s
The Punisher delivers. This is the kind of action that the 80’s were known for.
There are a handful of movies that I watch when I want to remember how
excessive violence was in cinema during the 80s: Commando (1985), Lethal Weapon
(1987), Cyborg (1989), Robocop (1987), Total Recall (1989), Die Hard (1988)…the
list can go on and on. These films remind me of a time when violence in cinema
was excessive, and when I compare them to today’s “action” films, well, today’s
stuff just pales in comparison. I mentioned a good example of this on a recent
article where I compared the new Total Recall (2012) remake with the old TotalRecall (1989). These are two films that are thematicallyl similar but are
totally different in terms of violence and gore. The Punisher is one of those
good old fashion action films that has shotguns shells flying, kicks, punches,
stabbings, decapitations, samurai swords, you name it, they use it on this
film. A little detail that’s interesting to note: The Punisher never uses the
same weapon twice!
This film comes to us
from director Mark Goldblatt also known as the guy who directed Dead Heat (1988),
which is a pretty fun zombie flick about a cop who gets turned into a zombie. Some
old dude is creating zombies to steal diamonds! For what purpose? Watch the
movie, but trust me, this is a fun, gory, violent, cop flick! The only way I
can describe it is Lethal Weapon meets Return of the Living Dead, trust me it’s
fun times for sure! Sadly, Goldblatt has never directed another film since he
made The Punisher. I guess that has a lot to do with the fact that neither of
these two films recuperated their budget at the box office, and you know how
unforgiving Hollywood studios are! The
Punisher was actually a huge turkey, it loss more than 8 million for its
producers, but like I said before, it was not the films fault. This film is solid
80’s style action, it’s dark and grimy, it’s action packed and it’s deadly
serious! A very underrated action flick from the decade of decadence. Need a
shot of testosterone?
Rating: 4 out of 5
I'm with you - I liked this version much better than the one with Thomas Jane, which I found to be excruciatingly boring. Dolph Lundgren did a pretty decent job, and Jeroen Krabbé was a great villain (I've liked him since seeing him in a couple of Paul Verhoeven's Dutch films and the James Bond movie The Living Daylights). Punisher: War Zone, with Ray Stevenson, was also a lot more fun than the 2004 film. It's extraordinarily violent; I wrote a review in which I called it the bastard child of an action movie and a Romero zombie film.
ReplyDeleteI love this version of the film, much more than the other updated ones, an instant classic then and now
ReplyDeleteThis was a staple of my adolescence! Dolph is the man! By the way, Ro and I have nominated you for a Liebster Award! Go here to check it out: http://rojomovie.blogspot.com/2012/08/liebster-award.html
ReplyDeleteI love this film too! I've always been annoyed at the reasons why some people bash it-it's usually for really stupid reasons! They whine about the missing skull on the uniform, and they bitch about how Frank Castle 'works with the mafia' in this movie, the very peole he wants dead. With a complaint like that, I doubt they've even seen the film!
ReplyDeleteI've heard from very reliable sources that P: War Zone is awesome! So be sure to check it out soon!
Jake: "You're crazy!"
ReplyDeletePunisher: "No, I'm not"
Jake: "What the f*** do you call 125 murders in 5 years?"
The Punisher: "Work in progress."
This is definitely in my top 3 Dolph movies. Lots of 80s fun - bloody action + corny one liners.
It's very cheap and rough around the edges but it's got a good pace (which is to be expected given that Goldblatt has edited a lot of action films). I like that they started with Frank already being the Punisher, as the comic book's origin is sort of a cinematic cliche now.
That said they actually deleted about 20 minutes (you can find it on youtube) from the start that showed Frank and Jake as cops prior to Frank's wife and kid being murdered.
On a side note, yeah I agree Thomas Jane was miscast in the 2004 film. That said, I quite enjoyed the fan film he did for the Comicon recently - Dirty Laundry - check it out if you haven't.
Michael: I really need to rewatch Punisher War Zone, I remember diggin the violence, but I can't remember much else! Expect a review soon! I'll try and check out yours, thanks for commenting.
ReplyDeleteSir Jorge: It still holds up very well, it's got one or two cheesy moments in there, like the one where Punisher fishes his informant with a bottle of alcohol strapped to a remote controlled toy truck, but the film has so much action, I love that shoot out when they first encounter the Yakuza!
jtwoddy1: Thanks for the award!
Chris Hewson: Yeah, most complaints end up being about the missing skull, which really isn't much of a complaint, hey, his skulls show up on the knives he leaves behind, they all have a little skull carved into them. I will be re-watching War Zone soon, expect a review in the coming weeks.
@Jack Thursby: True, the onliners are awesome, I read that Lundgren himself helped write some of the dialog!
True about Goldblatt, he's more of an editor than a director, he has edited many films in his career and he is still going strong.
I found some images of the deleted scenes but have never seen them myself, I will definetly be searching it out on You Tube or something.
I heard about Dirty Laundry, it has gotten rave reviews all around, I guess Jane decided to make up with that short film for the crappy movie, looking forward to checking it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p750oBgKzyE
ReplyDeleteHere you go - this is part 1 of the deleted opening. Pretty murky looking but then again the whole movie was. Makes for an interesting extra but I'm glad they cut it and got straight to the action.
Definitely check out Dirty Laundry when you get a chance. Very slow going but quite satisfying. It's got a surprise cameo from another big name actor but I won't spoil it.
I lost my copy of this a couple of years ago... I used to throw it in periodically to feel happy. Granted one of my roommates used to ALWAYS point out that you can see Lundgren's balls in his sewer meditation scene.
ReplyDeleteNot sure why he always thought that was important.
@Jack: You mean Ron Perlman? Don't worry, I read about that, all that's left is watching it. Thanks for the link to the deleted scene, i will be checking it out soon.
ReplyDelete@KevD.: I found a copy of this dvd by pure chance at a Walgreen's sale bin and I couldn't believe I had found it, of course I bought it right away! I was so happy to finally have it, now all I need is to find a copy of I come In Peace and I can die happy. I haven't seen that one in ages and I seem to remember liking it.
I'll have to freeze frame that subway meditation sequence to check it out...just kidding! LOL.
Kev D: I totally forgot about the nude Lundgren scenes - what the hell were they all about? Anyway, thanks for imprinting them back in my mind!
ReplyDeleteI COME IN PEACE!!!! wow. That was another one from my childhood. I'd love to see that again...
ReplyDelete@Jack: That's what I'm here for... reminding people to watch for Lundgren testicle and potential side-peen.