Title: The Dreamers (2003)
Director: Bernardo Bertolucci
Cast: Michael Pitt, Eva Green, Louis Garrel
Review:
Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Dreamers is a film filled with
nostalgia for the late 60’s, a time of chaos and anarchy. The time was 1968,
and France
was undergoing all kinds of revolutions. The workers were angry, the students
were angry, people wanted to earn more, work less. Students wanted education to
be more affordable. And film buffs wanted to watch their movies! That’s right;
this was also a cultural revolution! You see the government decided they needed
to close down theaters because films, as I’m sure most film buffs and critics
understand, is a powerful medium with which to transmit ideas, almost too
powerful in some peoples eyes. Film transmits ideas faster than anything,
faster then reading a book or a pamphlet. In other words: film would make the
masses think; a dangerous thing in the eyes of any form of government. People
getting smart? People expressing themselves? Artists, cinephiles and poets
gathering? Talking politics? Not a good idea! So the French government decided
to close down a major theater called ‘Cinematheque Francais’; this was an
action that was met by uproar from the film buff community, which at the time
was growing strong.
I found this so interesting because actually, a similar
situation occurred in my country a couple of years ago. There was this theater
in San Juan (the capital of Puerto Rico) called ‘Filmoteca Nacional de Puerto
Rico’ and it was this small theater with two screens with room for little more
than 150 people per screen. These screens where used by local indie filmmakers
(such as myself) to play their independent films in. The place was thriving,
people where coming to see the movies they made themselves. It was a theater
for the people and by the people. Money was being made, I know I made a bit.
But making money was beside the point, what I was loving about the place was
that people were coming to see my movies! And enjoying them! Other indie
filmmakers were doing the same and so, a local underground film movement was
being born. The government got a whiff of it and what happens? They shut down
the place for no reason whatsoever. Supposedly, the air conditioning system
couldn’t be fixed. Which of course was total bull, what they did was shut down
a venue where people were expressing themselves through film. The real problem
was that most of the films being made were anti-government!
The Dreamers takes place under similar circumstances, but on
a much more violent scale. Film buffs where angry! Filmmakers went out on the
street and protested against their voices being muted. What happened during
1968 in France
was a real cultural revolution! Of course this revolution was way bigger then censoring
filmmakers, but it’s a small example of the repression that was going on in the
country. And people don’t like to be repressed; we all enjoy our freedoms don’t
we? So this is where The Dreamers begins, right smack in the middle of all this
chaos. Matthew, is the naive and kind of innocent American teenager who goes to France to study; he's a a true film
buff, and so he ends up meeting Isabelle and Theo two French revolutionary film
buffs themselves. That day when they first meet, they immediately hit it off! They
talk about movies, take strolls down Paris
and that very night become inseparable friends. One thing leads to another and
Theo and Isabella end up inviting Matthew to move in with them. A love triangle
ensues.
Sex was a huge part of the revolution back in those days,
same as it was in the United
States . It’s as if having crazy sexual exploits
was something that no one could take away from them so they were going to do
it. In a way, it was the ultimate revolution. Matthew says it at one point, he
mentions that violence is something that the police does; it’s not what they
do. What they do is kiss and make out, as much as they can. And so, The
Dreamers got the dreaded NC-17 rating from the Motion Picture Association of
America because of its explicit nudity and sexual situations; in other words,
everybody goes full frontal on this one. If you can’t take that sort of thing,
then don’t bother because this film is very graphic in this department, the
camera gets right in there, right in the middle of things. Characters walk
around naked in their apartment through a large part of the film. The three
main characters reject what’s happening in their country and instead choose to
lock themselves in their apartment and make out day and night. So anyways, I’m
European at heart, so nudity in a film is really not a big thing for me, in
fact, it kind of natural, as Sigmund Freud used to say we are all sexual
creatures and well, sex is a part of life, there’s no point in denying it. Yet
the film does address the fact that certain sexual behaviors are wrong. Theo
and Isabelle are too close for comfort and Matthew points it out to them. The
threesome uses their sexual adventures to ignore the realities of the harsh
world, but what the film tries to tell us is that there’s no point in denying
these realities, sooner or later they come crashing into our lives.
The film also functions as a huge love letter to cinema, and
I say ‘cinema’ because that’s how films are referred to in France . No one
says “movie”, its either ‘cinema’ or ‘films’. Bertolucci constantly quotes
other filmmakers in this film; in fact, he quotes Godard quite a lot. But
Bertolucci doesn’t excuse himself for this; he says he is quoting Godard and there’s
nothing wrong with that because Godard himself quoted other filmmakers and
writers himself on his films. So this is a film about film; the three main
characters are true film buffs in the best sense of the word. They go to the
theater regularly, they analyze films, and they have discussions on who is funnier
Buster Keaton or Charles Chaplin? They quote films, reenact films; they even
play games where you have to guess which film the quote is from. I loved this
about The Dreamers because I get them, because I myself love film as much as
these crazy dudes, and I, like them, also went through my own revolution. Funny
how similar the revolution portrayed on this film was to the one that occurred
here in Puerto Rico in 2010 and in many parts
of the world for that matter.
Same as the characters on The Dreamers, when cops were
hitting students and spraying pepper spray on their faces for no good reason, we asked ourselves the very same questions
that Matthew, Theo and Isabelle ask themselves. If we care so much about the
repression; then why aren’t we out there? Should we take up Molotov bombs and
attack? Should we, should we, should we? Will a revolt change anything? Or will
the powers that be get their way anyways in the end? It seems this scenario has
been played to death across time. The documentary images that Bertolucci
includes in the film of cops hitting students and protesters are so similar to
those I saw and lived through a few years ago in my own country, that it almost
feels uncanny. Same as in France
of 1968, the revolution fizzled away, yet the people where victorious in some
respects, the revolution wasn’t a total loss. The ‘Cinematheque Francais’
opened it’s doors yet again, and film buffs got to watch their films once
again. The Dreamers is a revolutionary film in every sense of the word,
cultural, social and sexual. Bertolucci made a beautiful, shocking yet poignant
film. Very relevant to our times even though it takes place in 1968.
Rating: 5 out of 5






